Checkmk vs OpenNMS

Overview

Checkmk

Stacks77

Followers99

Votes0

OpenNMS

Stacks2

Followers9

Votes0

Checkmk vs OpenNMS: What are the differences?

Monitoring Capabilities: Checkmk offers a wide range of monitoring capabilities out of the box, including network, server, cloud, and application monitoring. On the other hand, OpenNMS is primarily focused on network monitoring and management, with limited support for other types of monitoring.
User Interface: Checkmk provides a user-friendly web-based interface that allows users to easily navigate and configure monitoring settings. In contrast, OpenNMS has a more complex and technical interface, which may require a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with network management tools.
Alerting System: Checkmk has a robust alerting system that supports various notification methods, such as email, SMS, and integration with third-party services. OpenNMS also offers alerting capabilities but may require more configuration and customization to achieve similar functionalities as Checkmk.
Community Support: Checkmk has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, plugins, and support forums. OpenNMS also has a supportive community but may not have as extensive resources and plugins available compared to Checkmk.
Licensing Model: Checkmk is available in both open-source and enterprise versions, offering flexibility for different types of users and organizations. On the other hand, OpenNMS is an open-source tool with no enterprise version, which may limit the availability of advanced features and support for enterprise users.
Scalability: Checkmk is known for its scalability, allowing users to monitor thousands of devices and applications without significant performance impact. OpenNMS, while also scalable, may require more resources and fine-tuning to achieve similar levels of performance in large-scale monitoring environments.

In Summary, when comparing Checkmk and OpenNMS, key differences lie in their monitoring capabilities, user interfaces, alerting systems, community support, licensing models, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkmk	OpenNMS
Checkmk is a comprehensive solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors.	The world's first enterprise-grade network management platform developed under the Open Source model
State-based monitoring; Log- and event-based monitoring;Graphing and analytics;Customizable GUI;Reporting;Business Intelligence;Hardware and software inventory;Notifications and alert handler;Rule-based configuration, auto-discovery and agent deployment; Scalability; User Management with LDAP/Active Directory;Predictive Monitoring; Capacity Management; Single Sign-On; Dynamic host configuration	-
Statistics
Stacks 77	Stacks 2
Followers 99	Followers 9
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to Checkmk, OpenNMS?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Checkmk vs OpenNMS: What are the differences?

Monitoring Capabilities: Checkmk offers a wide range of monitoring capabilities out of the box, including network, server, cloud, and application monitoring. On the other hand, OpenNMS is primarily focused on network monitoring and management, with limited support for other types of monitoring.
User Interface: Checkmk provides a user-friendly web-based interface that allows users to easily navigate and configure monitoring settings. In contrast, OpenNMS has a more complex and technical interface, which may require a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with network management tools.
Alerting System: Checkmk has a robust alerting system that supports various notification methods, such as email, SMS, and integration with third-party services. OpenNMS also offers alerting capabilities but may require more configuration and customization to achieve similar functionalities as Checkmk.
Community Support: Checkmk has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, plugins, and support forums. OpenNMS also has a supportive community but may not have as extensive resources and plugins available compared to Checkmk.
Licensing Model: Checkmk is available in both open-source and enterprise versions, offering flexibility for different types of users and organizations. On the other hand, OpenNMS is an open-source tool with no enterprise version, which may limit the availability of advanced features and support for enterprise users.
Scalability: Checkmk is known for its scalability, allowing users to monitor thousands of devices and applications without significant performance impact. OpenNMS, while also scalable, may require more resources and fine-tuning to achieve similar levels of performance in large-scale monitoring environments.

In Summary, when comparing Checkmk and OpenNMS, key differences lie in their monitoring capabilities, user interfaces, alerting systems, community support, licensing models, and scalability.

Checkmk vs OpenNMS

Overview