StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Checkstyle vs XRebel

Checkstyle vs XRebel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
Stacks132
Followers107
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks3.9K
XRebel
XRebel
Stacks2
Followers5
Votes0

Checkstyle vs XRebel: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the context of software development tools, Checkstyle and XRebel are two popular choices that serve different purposes. Understanding their key differences can help developers make informed decisions on which tool best fits their needs.

1. Integration with IDEs: Checkstyle is primarily focused on static code analysis and can be integrated with popular IDEs like Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and NetBeans. On the other hand, XRebel is a performance monitoring tool designed to be integrated with Java application servers, providing real-time insights into application performance.

2. Functionality: Checkstyle mainly focuses on enforcing coding standards and best practices, such as code formatting and naming conventions. It helps maintain code quality and consistency across teams. XRebel, on the other hand, specializes in monitoring performance metrics, identifying bottlenecks, and optimizing application performance.

3. User Interface: Checkstyle typically offers a command-line interface or IDE plugin for configuration and running checks. In contrast, XRebel provides a user-friendly web-based interface with real-time dashboards and visualizations to analyze performance data efficiently.

4. Deployment and Monitoring: While both Checkstyle and XRebel can be used during the development phase, their deployment and monitoring processes vary. Checkstyle is integrated into the development environment to enforce coding standards during coding and build processes. XRebel, however, is deployed in production environments to monitor and optimize application performance during runtime.

5. Use Case: Checkstyle is well-suited for ensuring code quality and consistency in the development phase, helping teams conform to coding standards and best practices. On the other hand, XRebel is more suitable for performance monitoring and optimization in production environments, enabling developers to identify and resolve performance issues in real-time.

6. Cost and Licensing: Checkstyle is an open-source tool available for free, making it accessible to developers of all levels. In contrast, XRebel is a commercial tool with various licensing options based on features and usage, which may require budget allocation for its adoption.

In Summary, Checkstyle focuses on static code analysis and enforcing coding standards, while XRebel specializes in real-time performance monitoring and optimization, catering to different aspects of the software development lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
XRebel
XRebel

It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.

It does things traditional profiling tools can’t. It allows developers to trace the impact of their code from beginning to end -- even in distributed applications. This, combined with real-time Java performance metrics, makes it a must-have tool for any Java developer. With this tool, developers can create better-performing applications that lead to better end user experience.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
132
Stacks
2
Followers
107
Followers
5
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Checkstyle , XRebel?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot