StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Vanilla.JS vs cheerio

Vanilla.JS vs cheerio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Stacks82
Followers85
Votes9
cheerio
cheerio
Stacks11
Followers9
Votes0
GitHub Stars29.9K
Forks1.7K

Vanilla.JS vs cheerio: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, there are various tools and frameworks that can be used for manipulating and navigating through HTML documents. Two popular options are Vanilla.JS and cheerio. While both are used for similar purposes, there are key differences between them that set them apart.

  1. Vanilla.JS: Vanilla.JS is the term used to refer to plain JavaScript without any additional libraries or frameworks. It provides a set of built-in methods and functions for manipulating HTML elements and interacting with the DOM (Document Object Model). With Vanilla.JS, developers have full control over their code and can customize it to fit their specific needs.

  2. cheerio: Cheerio, on the other hand, is a fast and flexible library for parsing and traversing HTML documents using a jQuery-like syntax. It is mainly used in server-side applications where the DOM is not available, or as a lightweight alternative to jQuery. Cheerio allows developers to easily extract data from HTML documents, manipulate the DOM, and perform complex operations.

  3. DOM Manipulation: One key difference between Vanilla.JS and cheerio is in the way they handle DOM manipulation. Vanilla.JS provides direct access to the DOM, allowing developers to easily modify elements, add event handlers, and perform other DOM-related operations. Cheerio, on the other hand, operates on a virtual DOM created from the HTML document, providing a simpler and more lightweight approach to DOM manipulation.

  4. Dependencies: Another difference between Vanilla.JS and cheerio is their dependencies. Vanilla.JS is standalone and does not require any additional dependencies or libraries. It is built into the browser itself and can be used directly. Cheerio, on the other hand, relies on the Node.js platform and requires installation via npm (Node Package Manager).

  5. Compatibility: Vanilla.JS is supported by all modern browsers, making it suitable for both client-side and server-side applications. It can be used in any environment that supports JavaScript. Cheerio, on the other hand, is primarily used in Node.js applications and is not designed to work directly in web browsers. It is specifically built for server-side HTML parsing and manipulation.

  6. jQuery Syntax: While Vanilla.JS provides a set of methods and functions for interacting with the DOM, the syntax for manipulating elements and performing operations can be quite verbose. On the other hand, cheerio uses a jQuery-like syntax, which is more concise and familiar to developers who have experience with jQuery. It provides a simpler and more intuitive way to navigate and manipulate HTML documents.

In summary, the key differences between Vanilla.JS and cheerio lie in their approach to DOM manipulation, dependencies, compatibility, and syntax. Vanilla.JS provides direct access to the DOM, has no dependencies, and is compatible with all modern browsers. Cheerio, on the other hand, operates on a virtual DOM, relies on Node.js, and uses a jQuery-like syntax for easier HTML parsing and manipulation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
cheerio
cheerio

It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.

Fast, flexible, and lean implementation of core jQuery designed specifically for the server.

-
Familiar syntax; Blazingly fast; Incredibly flexible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
29.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
82
Stacks
11
Followers
85
Followers
9
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Web-components
  • 1
    NO CONVENTIONS
  • 1
    Unopinionated
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    You need to build anything yourself
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Vanilla.JS, cheerio?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase