StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Cisco Firepower vs Fail2ban

Cisco Firepower vs Fail2ban

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fail2ban
Fail2ban
Stacks64
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.9K
Forks1.4K
Cisco Firepower
Cisco Firepower
Stacks10
Followers24
Votes0

Cisco Firepower vs Fail2ban: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cisco Firepower and Fail2ban

1. Integration with Network Infrastructure: Cisco Firepower is a robust network security platform that offers built-in network infrastructure integration, allowing it to seamlessly integrate with other Cisco security solutions and network devices. On the other hand, Fail2ban is a software that runs on individual servers and provides protection against brute-force attacks by dynamically blocking IP addresses. However, it does not have built-in integration with network infrastructure.

2. Functionality and Scope: Cisco Firepower provides comprehensive network security features, including firewall, intrusion prevention system (IPS), advanced malware protection (AMP), and virtual private network (VPN) capabilities. It offers a wide range of security functions and a centralized management interface. Fail2ban, on the other hand, focuses specifically on protecting servers from brute-force attacks by monitoring log files and blocking suspicious IP addresses.

3. Scalability and Deployment Flexibility: Cisco Firepower is designed to cater to the needs of enterprise-level networks and offers scalability and deployment flexibility. It can be seamlessly integrated into existing network infrastructures and can handle large amounts of network traffic. Fail2ban, on the other hand, is typically deployed on individual servers and may not be as scalable or flexible in a large network environment.

4. Management and Reporting Capabilities: Cisco Firepower offers a centralized management interface that allows administrators to easily configure, monitor, and manage network security policies. It also provides advanced reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing administrators to gain valuable insights into network security. Fail2ban, on the other hand, requires manual configuration on each server and may lack the centralized management and reporting features offered by Cisco Firepower.

5. Vendor Support and Updates: Cisco is a renowned networking and security vendor with a strong commitment to regular updates and ongoing support. Customers of Cisco Firepower can benefit from timely software updates, bug fixes, and access to technical support. Fail2ban, on the other hand, is an open-source solution that may rely on community support for updates and troubleshooting.

6. Cost and Licensing Model: Cisco Firepower is a commercial product that requires purchasing licenses based on the number of devices and the desired features. The cost of deploying Cisco Firepower can be substantial, especially for large-scale deployments. Fail2ban, on the other hand, is an open-source solution available for free, making it a more cost-effective option for smaller deployments.

In summary, Cisco Firepower offers seamless integration with network infrastructure, comprehensive network security features, scalability, centralized management, vendor support, and the flexibility to handle large-scale deployments, while Fail2ban focuses specifically on protecting servers from brute-force attacks, requires manual configuration, relies on community support, and is more cost-effective for smaller deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fail2ban
Fail2ban
Cisco Firepower
Cisco Firepower

It is an intrusion prevention software framework that protects computer servers from brute-force attacks. Written in the Python programming language, it is able to run on POSIX systems that have an interface to a packet-control system or firewall installed locally, for example, iptables or TCP Wrapper.

Protect your business while you grow your business. It offers performance, ease of use, and deep visibility and control to detect and stop threats fast. Its design optimizes security services without degrading network performance.

-
Application Visibility and Control (AVC); Next-Gen IPS (NGIPS); Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks; URL Filtering
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
64
Stacks
10
Followers
57
Followers
24
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Fail2ban, Cisco Firepower?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope