Closure Library vs jQuery

Overview

jQuery

Stacks195.3K

Followers70.6K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars59.6K

Forks20.5K

Closure Library

Stacks28

Followers50

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.9K

Forks1.1K

Closure Library vs jQuery: What are the differences?

1. **Architecture**: The Closure Library uses a modular architecture where components are organized in namespaces, providing a more structured approach. On the other hand, jQuery is based on a monolithic architecture with all functions and plugins in a single library, making it easier to get started but potentially leading to larger file sizes. 2. **Performance**: Closure Library tends to have better performance in terms of speed and memory usage due to its optimized code and static type checking. jQuery, although easy to use, may sometimes face performance issues depending on the complexity of the script. 3. **Dependency Management**: Closure Library has built-in dependency management, allowing developers to specify dependencies between modules and load only what is needed. jQuery relies on script loading mechanisms for handling dependencies, which can sometimes lead to conflicts or inefficient loading sequences. 4. **Browser Compatibility**: Closure Library puts a strong emphasis on cross-browser compatibility and handles browser quirks and inconsistencies efficiently. jQuery also provides cross-browser compatibility, but it may require additional plugins or workarounds in certain cases. 5. **Community and Support**: jQuery has a larger community and more extensive resources readily available, making it easier for developers to find solutions and plugins. Closure Library, although backed by Google, has a smaller community and fewer third-party plugins or extensions available for use. 6. **Learning Curve**: Closure Library requires a more significant learning curve due to its structured approach and complex concepts like namespaces and modules. In contrast, jQuery is relatively easy to learn, making it a popular choice for beginners or projects with tight deadlines.

In Summary, Closure Library and jQuery differ in architecture, performance, dependency management, browser compatibility, community support, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on jQuery, Closure Library

Peter

Senior Software Engineer

Sep 20, 2020

Decided

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

72.4k views72.4k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery	Closure Library
jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.	Closure Library is a powerful, low-level JavaScript library designed for building complex and scalable web applications. It is used by many Google web applications, such as Google Search, Gmail, Google Docs, Google+, Google Maps, and others.
-	cross-browser functions for DOM manipulations and events, Ajax and JSON; high-level objects such as User Interface widgets and Controls
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.6K	GitHub Stars 4.9K
GitHub Forks 20.5K	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 195.3K	Stacks 28
Followers 70.6K	Followers 50
Votes 6.6K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1263 Cross-browser 957 Dom manipulation 809 Power 660 Open source 610 Plugins Cons 6 Large size 5 Encourages DOM as primary data source 5 Sometimes inconsistent API 2 Live events is overly complex feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Closure Compiler

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Closure Library?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Closure Library vs jQuery: What are the differences?

In Summary, Closure Library and jQuery differ in architecture, performance, dependency management, browser compatibility, community support, and learning curve.

Closure Library vs jQuery

Overview