StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. CockroachDB vs HarperDB

CockroachDB vs HarperDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CockroachDB
CockroachDB
Stacks216
Followers341
Votes0
HarperDB
HarperDB
Stacks6
Followers18
Votes9

CockroachDB vs HarperDB: What are the differences?

Write Introduction here
  1. Architecture: CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database designed for scalability, while HarperDB is a distributed database with a unique hybrid SQL/NoSQL architecture. CockroachDB is an SQL-based database that offers horizontal scalability and high availability through its distributed design and uses the Raft consensus algorithm. In contrast, HarperDB combines the flexibility of NoSQL with the power of SQL in a single model, allowing users to choose between document-based and schema-based data storage.

  2. Consistency Model: CockroachDB is based on the traditional ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) consistency model, ensuring data integrity and reliability across distributed clusters. HarperDB, on the other hand, offers tunable consistency levels, allowing users to choose between eventual consistency for improved performance or strong consistency for critical operations.

  3. Data Replication: CockroachDB utilizes synchronous replication to ensure data durability and consistency across nodes in a cluster. HarperDB also supports replication for high availability but provides users with the flexibility to configure replication settings based on their specific use case requirements.

  4. Query Language: CockroachDB is compatible with PostgreSQL wire protocol, allowing users to leverage existing PostgreSQL tools and applications seamlessly. HarperDB supports SQL for structured data queries along with NoSQL capabilities for unstructured data storage and retrieval, offering a versatile querying experience.

  5. Designed Use Cases: CockroachDB is well-suited for cloud-native applications, global deployments, and use cases requiring strong consistency and scalability. In comparison, HarperDB targets edge computing, IoT, and real-time data processing applications that demand a versatile database capable of handling diverse data types and workloads.

  6. Deployment Flexibility: CockroachDB can be deployed on-premises, in multi-cloud environments, or in a hybrid cloud setup, providing users with deployment flexibility based on their infrastructure preferences. HarperDB offers a lightweight footprint and can run on IoT devices, edge servers, or traditional cloud environments, enabling decentralized data processing and storage scenarios.

In Summary, CockroachDB emphasizes scalability and high availability through an SQL-based distributed architecture, while HarperDB offers a unique hybrid SQL/NoSQL model with tunable consistency levels and deployment flexibility to cater to diverse use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CockroachDB
CockroachDB
HarperDB
HarperDB

CockroachDB is distributed SQL database that can be deployed in serverless, dedicated, or on-prem. Elastic scale, multi-active availability for resilience, and low latency performance.

Harper takes the "stack" out of "tech stack" by combining data storage, caching, application, and messaging functions into a single technology to achieve unmatched global low latency, simplicity, and cost performance at scale.

sql; high availability; fast; acid;
Cloud; Edge Computing; On Prem; Globally Distributed; Custom Functions; Database-as-a-service; Hybrid Cloud; Clustering and Replication; Fully-Indexed; Dynamic Schema; Small Footprint; SQL Query Engine; Full NoSQL Capabilities; Configurable Table-Level Pub/Sub; Built In API with Single End Point; Role Based Security; User Friendly Management Studio; Industry Standard Interfaces & Drivers;
Statistics
Stacks
216
Stacks
6
Followers
341
Followers
18
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Data api
  • 1
    Flexibility
  • 1
    Distribution capabilities
  • 1
    Cost efficient
  • 1
    Performance
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
GraphQL
GraphQL
Docker
Docker
.NET
.NET
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
React.js Boilerplate
React.js Boilerplate
uWebSockets
uWebSockets
Python
Python
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to CockroachDB, HarperDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase