StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Cocoa Touch (iOS) vs PHP-MVC

Cocoa Touch (iOS) vs PHP-MVC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Stacks202
Followers208
Votes12
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3

Cocoa Touch (iOS) vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we'll highlight key differences between Cocoa Touch (iOS) and PHP-MVC architecture.

1. **Language and Platform Ecosystem**: Cocoa Touch is specific to the iOS platform and uses Objective-C or Swift programming languages, whereas PHP-MVC is a web-based architecture that utilizes PHP as the server-side language combined with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript on the front end.
2. **Native vs Web Development**: Cocoa Touch facilitates native app development, allowing for better performance and access to device-specific features, while PHP-MVC is focused on web development, providing cross-platform compatibility but with limitations in utilizing device functionalities.
3. **Design Patterns & Architecture**: Cocoa Touch follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) design pattern, providing a structured way to separate application logic, while PHP-MVC is an architectural pattern that separates the application into three interconnected components for easier maintenance and scalability.
4. **Tooling & Development Environment**: iOS development with Cocoa Touch typically involves Xcode IDE and the use of frameworks like UIKit, CoreData, and CoreAnimation, whereas PHP-MVC development often includes tools like Apache, MySQL, and PHP frameworks like Laravel or CodeIgniter.
5. **Deployment & Distribution**: Apps developed with Cocoa Touch are typically deployed to the App Store for distribution and undergo a review process, while PHP-MVC applications are deployed on web servers and do not require submission for approval.

# Summary
In summary, Cocoa Touch (iOS) and PHP-MVC differ in terms of platform ecosystem, development focus, design patterns, tooling, and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC

The Cocoa Touch layer contains key frameworks for building iOS apps. These frameworks define the appearance of your app. They also provide the basic app infrastructure and support for key technologies such as multitasking, touch-based input, push notifications, and many high-level system services.

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Statistics
Stacks
202
Stacks
106
Followers
208
Followers
222
Votes
12
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Backed by Apple
  • 4
    It's just awesome
  • 2
    User Friendly Performance
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
Swift
Swift
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Cocoa Touch (iOS), PHP-MVC?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase