Codeception vs Kotest

Overview

Codeception

Stacks155

Followers111

Votes5

Kotest

Stacks12

Followers12

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.7K

Forks695

Codeception vs Kotest: What are the differences?

Testing Framework Support: Codeception primarily focuses on PHP testing, while Kotest is a testing framework designed for Kotlin language, allowing developers to write tests in Kotlin. This fundamental difference in language support guides developers to choose between the two based on their preferred programming language.
Asynchronous Testing: Codeception lacks robust support for asynchronous testing, whereas Kotest excels in handling asynchronous operations by providing built-in support for async testing with various mechanisms like suspending functions and coroutines. This makes Kotest a preferred choice for applications relying heavily on asynchronous code.
Assertion Libraries: Codeception comes with built-in assertion methods, while Kotest allows developers to use third-party assertion libraries such as AssertK or Kotest assertions. The flexibility to choose assertion libraries in Kotest enables developers to tailor their testing approach according to their project requirements.
Parameterized Tests: Codeception does not offer native support for parameterized tests, while Kotest provides a clear and concise way to create parameterized tests using data tables or custom data providers. This difference can significantly impact the ease of writing and maintaining tests in projects requiring parameterized testing scenarios.
Extensibility: Codeception offers a wide range of plugins and extensions to enhance its functionality, but Kotest surpasses in extensibility by providing a highly modular architecture that allows developers to create custom extensions easily. This extensibility feature of Kotest can cater to complex testing requirements and provide a more tailored testing experience.
Community and Documentation: Codeception boasts a larger community and more extensive documentation due to its longevity in the PHP testing ecosystem, while Kotest being a relatively newer testing framework may have a smaller community and documentation base. Developers looking for comprehensive community support and resources may lean towards Codeception for their testing needs.

In Summary, Codeception and Kotest differ in language support, asynchronous testing capabilities, assertion libraries, support for parameterized tests, extensibility, and community/documentation resources, guiding developers to choose based on their specific project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codeception	Kotest
Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.	It is a flexible and comprehensive testing project for Kotlin with multiplatform support.
-	Test whole collections with Inspectors; Reuse test logic for setup or tear down, with Listeners; Make use of custom plugins for integrations with tools such as Pitest; Test Arrow data types with the Arrow extension
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 695
Stacks 155	Stacks 12
Followers 111	Followers 12
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Easy to get up and running some simple tests	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Kotlin

What are some alternatives to Codeception, Kotest?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

Codeception vs Kotest: What are the differences?

Testing Framework Support: Codeception primarily focuses on PHP testing, while Kotest is a testing framework designed for Kotlin language, allowing developers to write tests in Kotlin. This fundamental difference in language support guides developers to choose between the two based on their preferred programming language.
Asynchronous Testing: Codeception lacks robust support for asynchronous testing, whereas Kotest excels in handling asynchronous operations by providing built-in support for async testing with various mechanisms like suspending functions and coroutines. This makes Kotest a preferred choice for applications relying heavily on asynchronous code.
Assertion Libraries: Codeception comes with built-in assertion methods, while Kotest allows developers to use third-party assertion libraries such as AssertK or Kotest assertions. The flexibility to choose assertion libraries in Kotest enables developers to tailor their testing approach according to their project requirements.
Parameterized Tests: Codeception does not offer native support for parameterized tests, while Kotest provides a clear and concise way to create parameterized tests using data tables or custom data providers. This difference can significantly impact the ease of writing and maintaining tests in projects requiring parameterized testing scenarios.
Extensibility: Codeception offers a wide range of plugins and extensions to enhance its functionality, but Kotest surpasses in extensibility by providing a highly modular architecture that allows developers to create custom extensions easily. This extensibility feature of Kotest can cater to complex testing requirements and provide a more tailored testing experience.
Community and Documentation: Codeception boasts a larger community and more extensive documentation due to its longevity in the PHP testing ecosystem, while Kotest being a relatively newer testing framework may have a smaller community and documentation base. Developers looking for comprehensive community support and resources may lean towards Codeception for their testing needs.

Codeception vs Kotest

Overview