StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CUBA Platform vs CodeIgniter

CUBA Platform vs CodeIgniter

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Stacks3.2K
Followers1.5K
Votes466
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform
Stacks10
Followers23
Votes3
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks216

CUBA Platform vs CodeIgniter: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CUBA Platform and CodeIgniter

  1. Architecture: CUBA Platform uses a generic application framework approach with a standardized architecture, while CodeIgniter follows a traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) pattern with more flexibility in coding styles and structure.

  2. Scalability: CUBA Platform offers more enterprise-level features such as built-in security, auditing, and multi-tenancy support, making it suitable for complex scalable applications. In contrast, CodeIgniter is lightweight and more focused on small to medium-sized projects with less built-in support for advanced enterprise features.

  3. Integrated Development Environment (IDE) Support: CUBA Platform provides a comprehensive development environment with a visual designer, data modeler, and integrated debugging tools, while CodeIgniter relies on third-party IDEs and tools for development activities.

  4. Learning Curve: CodeIgniter has a shorter learning curve due to its simplicity and lightweight nature, making it more accessible to beginners and developers with less experience. On the other hand, CUBA Platform may have a steeper learning curve due to its more comprehensive set of features and complex architecture.

  5. Community and Support: CodeIgniter has a large community and extensive documentation available online, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and access community support. In comparison, CUBA Platform has a smaller community but offers official support and training resources for developers.

In Summary, CUBA Platform is more suitable for enterprise-level applications with advanced features and scalability, while CodeIgniter is ideal for smaller projects with a simpler architecture and faster learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CodeIgniter, CUBA Platform

Ajeet
Ajeet

Dec 16, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, We are thinking to rebuild a website and need your suggestion on which platform to choose from NodeJs, Laravel & CodeIgnitor. Since it's an education base website and there will be multiple functionalities like the use of graphics, video, animation and off-course forms for lead generation. Please advise us which tool to use to build the website considering load-time, server security, code vulnerability, etc.

216k views216k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform

CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.

It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development.

-
Generic user interface; Multiple data stores; User management; Data access control; Full audit of user actions; Dynamic attributes; File storage; Admin tools; Scheduled tasks; Generic REST API; Single sign-on
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
216
Stacks
3.2K
Stacks
10
Followers
1.5K
Followers
23
Votes
466
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 88
    Mvc
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 70
    Open source
  • 62
    Well documented
  • 36
    Community support
Cons
  • 6
    No ORM
  • 1
    No CLI
Pros
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Component based
  • 1
    Lots out of the box
Integrations
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CodeIgniter, CUBA Platform?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase