Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CodePicnic vs Runnable: What are the differences?
Developers describe CodePicnic as "Full-stack code containers right in the browser". Want to explain some client-side code or server-side project? We made it happen. Say "Hi" to CodePicnic. Your neighborhood platform for sharing and running code in the browser. On the other hand, Runnable is detailed as "Full-stack environments for every branch, and any application". Runnable saves time and frustration caused by development pipeline and the staging server by providing full-stack environments for every code branch, and any application.
CodePicnic and Runnable can be categorized as "Sandbox as a Service" tools.
Some of the features offered by CodePicnic are:
- Full Back-end Consoles - From a Linux shell to a Express.js app. Create consoles with Ruby, Python, PHP or Node.js. If it runs on GNU/Linux, we can handle.
- Embeddable servers - Use your consoles inside your site, Tumblr blog or Medium. Let those text-only tutorials in the past.
- Shareable - Everyone gets their own console copy! Safe and secure to play around, mess with and even export it to Github.
On the other hand, Runnable provides the following key features:
- Environments are created and kept up-to-date automatically based on branch activity.
- Environments are full-stack, including replicated databases and other services needed to run your stack.
- Run end-to-end tests for every code change, including support for Selenium/Webdriver tests.
Pros of CodePicnic
- No messups with your system2