StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Sandbox As A Service
  5. CodePicnic vs Runnable

CodePicnic vs Runnable

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CodePicnic
CodePicnic
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes2
Runnable
Runnable
Stacks7
Followers15
Votes0

CodePicnic vs Runnable: What are the differences?

Developers describe CodePicnic as "Full-stack code containers right in the browser". Want to explain some client-side code or server-side project? We made it happen. Say "Hi" to CodePicnic. Your neighborhood platform for sharing and running code in the browser. On the other hand, Runnable is detailed as "Full-stack environments for every branch, and any application". Runnable saves time and frustration caused by development pipeline and the staging server by providing full-stack environments for every code branch, and any application.

CodePicnic and Runnable can be categorized as "Sandbox as a Service" tools.

Some of the features offered by CodePicnic are:

  • Full Back-end Consoles - From a Linux shell to a Express.js app. Create consoles with Ruby, Python, PHP or Node.js. If it runs on GNU/Linux, we can handle.
  • Embeddable servers - Use your consoles inside your site, Tumblr blog or Medium. Let those text-only tutorials in the past.
  • Shareable - Everyone gets their own console copy! Safe and secure to play around, mess with and even export it to Github.

On the other hand, Runnable provides the following key features:

  • Environments are created and kept up-to-date automatically based on branch activity.
  • Environments are full-stack, including replicated databases and other services needed to run your stack.
  • Run end-to-end tests for every code change, including support for Selenium/Webdriver tests.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CodePicnic
CodePicnic
Runnable
Runnable

Want to explain some client-side code or server-side project? We made it happen. Say "Hi" to CodePicnic. Your neighborhood platform for sharing and running code in the browser.

Runnable saves time and frustration caused by development pipeline and the staging server by providing full-stack environments for every code branch, and any application.

Full Back-end Consoles - From a Linux shell to a Express.js app. Create consoles with Ruby, Python, PHP or Node.js. If it runs on GNU/Linux, we can handle.;Embeddable servers - Use your consoles inside your site, Tumblr blog or Medium. Let those text-only tutorials in the past.;Shareable - Everyone gets their own console copy! Safe and secure to play around, mess with and even export it to Github.
Environments are created and kept up-to-date automatically based on branch activity.; Environments are full-stack, including replicated databases and other services needed to run your stack.; Run end-to-end tests for every code change, including support for Selenium/Webdriver tests.; Environment links and test results are posted on the Pull Request pages in GitHub for easier reviews.
Statistics
Stacks
3
Stacks
7
Followers
12
Followers
15
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    No messups with your system
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to CodePicnic, Runnable?

Coder

Coder

Coder moves developer workspaces to your cloud and centralizes their creation and management. With Coder, developers can get up and running on new projects right away and stay in flow using their preferred IDE and tools.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana