Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CoffeeScript vs Elixir: What are the differences?
# Key Differences between CoffeeScript and Elixir
Elixir is a functional programming language built on top of the Erlang VM, while CoffeeScript is a language that compiles into JavaScript.
1. **Syntax**: Elixir uses a Ruby-like syntax with powerful pattern matching and macros, whereas CoffeeScript aims to simplify JavaScript syntax with a more expressive and concise style.
2. **Concurrency Model**: Elixir utilizes lightweight threads called "actors" for concurrency, making it easier to write highly concurrent, fault-tolerant applications, while CoffeeScript does not inherently support concurrent programming.
3. **Error Handling**: Elixir has built-in support for fault-tolerant systems through its "supervision trees" and lightweight processes, making it easier to manage errors and recover from failures, whereas CoffeeScript relies on traditional error handling mechanisms provided by JavaScript.
4. **Functional Paradigm**: Elixir is a functional language that encourages immutability, pure functions, and pattern matching, promoting better code maintainability and scalability, while CoffeeScript is more focused on providing syntactic sugar and abstraction on top of JavaScript's object-oriented paradigm.
5. **Tooling and Ecosystem**: Elixir has a robust standard library, package manager (Hex), and widely used web framework (Phoenix) for building scalable web applications, while CoffeeScript lacks an extensive standard library or a widely adopted framework for browser-based applications.
6. **Performance**: Elixir is generally faster and more efficient due to running on the Erlang VM, which is optimized for concurrency, while CoffeeScript's performance is dependent on the generated JavaScript code and the underlying JavaScript engine.
In Summary, Elixir and CoffeeScript differ in syntax, concurrency model, error handling, functional paradigm, tooling, ecosystem, and performance, catering to different needs and preferences in programming.
#rust #elixir So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me
We have a lot of experience in JavaScript, writing our services in NodeJS allows developers to transition to the back end without any friction, without having to learn a new language. There is also the option to write services in TypeScript, which adds an expressive type layer. The semi-shared ecosystem between front and back end is nice as well, though specifically NodeJS libraries sometimes suffer in quality, compared to other major languages.
As for why we didn't pick the other languages, most of it comes down to "personal preference" and historically grown code bases, but let's do some post-hoc deduction:
Go is a practical choice, reasonably easy to learn, but until we find performance issues with our NodeJS stack, there is simply no reason to switch. The benefits of using NodeJS so far outweigh those of picking Go. This might change in the future.
PHP is a language we're still using in big parts of our system, and are still sometimes writing new code in. Modern PHP has fixed some of its issues, and probably has the fastest development cycle time, but it suffers around modelling complex asynchronous tasks, and (on a personal note) lack of support for writing in a functional style.
We don't use Python, Elixir or Ruby, mostly because of personal preference and for historic reasons.
Rust, though I personally love and use it in my projects, would require us to specifically hire for that, as the learning curve is quite steep. Its web ecosystem is OK by now (see https://www.arewewebyet.org/), but in my opinion, it is still no where near that of the other web languages. In other words, we are not willing to pay the price for playing this innovation card.
Haskell, as with Rust, I personally adore, but is simply too esoteric for us. There are problem domains where it shines, ours is not one of them.
Pros of CoffeeScript
- Easy to read199
- Faster to write179
- Syntactic sugar126
- Readable104
- Elegant104
- Pretty73
- Javascript the good parts53
- Open source48
- Classes44
- "it's just javascript"35
- Compact code16
- Easy15
- Simple13
- Not Javascript13
- Does the same with less code2
- I'm jobs I'm software engineer1
Pros of Elixir
- Concurrency174
- Functional162
- Erlang vm133
- Great documentation113
- Great tooling105
- Immutable data structures87
- Open source81
- Pattern-matching77
- Easy to get started62
- Actor library59
- Functional with a neat syntax32
- Ruby inspired29
- Erlang evolved25
- Homoiconic24
- Beauty of Ruby, Speed of Erlang/C22
- Fault Tolerant17
- Simple14
- High Performance13
- Doc as first class citizen11
- Good lang11
- Pipe Operator11
- Stinkin' fast, no memory leaks, easy on the eyes9
- Fun to write9
- OTP8
- Resilient to failure8
- GenServer takes the guesswork out of background work6
- Pattern matching4
- Not Swift4
- Idempotence4
- Fast, Concurrent with clean error messages4
- Easy to use3
- Dynamic Typing2
- Error isolation2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CoffeeScript
- No ES63
- Corner cases in syntax1
- Parentheses required in 0-ary function calls1
- Unclear what will be grouped to {…}1
Cons of Elixir
- Fewer jobs for Elixir experts11
- Smaller userbase than other mainstream languages7
- Elixir's dot notation less readable ("object": 1st arg)5
- Dynamic typing4
- Difficult to understand2
- Not a lot of learning books available1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is CoffeeScript?
What is Elixir?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Elixir?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+8
+39
+33+29