StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Graphite vs collectd

Graphite vs collectd

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Graphite
Graphite
Stacks383
Followers419
Votes42
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks1.3K
collectd
collectd
Stacks98
Followers156
Votes5
GitHub Stars3.3K
Forks1.3K

Graphite vs collectd: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Graphite and Collectd

Graphite and collectd are both tools used for monitoring and graphing purposes, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Here are the main differences between Graphite and collectd:

1. **Data Storage**: Graphite stores data in a time-series database called Whisper, while collectd uses RRDtool for storing collected data points. Whisper allows for better scalability and flexibility in managing large amounts of data compared to RRDtool.

2. **Data Collection**: Graphite primarily focuses on graphing and visualization of data, while collectd is more focused on collecting system performance data. Collectd can gather a wide range of metrics from various sources, making it a versatile monitoring tool.

3. **Data Retention Policies**: Graphite allows for more customizable data retention policies, enabling users to define how long data should be stored. On the other hand, collectd has predefined data retention policies that might not be as flexible as those in Graphite.

4. **Architecture**: Graphite is made up of three components: Carbon for receiving data, Whisper for storing data, and Graphite web for visualization. Collectd, on the other hand, is a lightweight daemon that collects data and sends it to a central server for processing.

5. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Collectd has a vast plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend its functionality and monitor a wide range of systems and applications. Graphite, while extensible, might not have as extensive a plugin ecosystem as collectd.

6. **Usage**: Graphite is more commonly used for monitoring and graphing metrics related to server performance and application behavior. Collectd, on the other hand, is more geared towards system administrators and developers who need to collect and analyze system performance data in real-time.

In Summary, Graphite and collectd have distinct differences in terms of data storage, collection, retention policies, architecture, plugin ecosystem, and usage scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Graphite, collectd

Leonardo Henrique da
Leonardo Henrique da

Pleno QA Enginneer at SolarMarket

Dec 8, 2020

Decided

The objective of this work was to develop a system to monitor the materials of a production line using IoT technology. Currently, the process of monitoring and replacing parts depends on manual services. For this, load cells, microcontroller, Broker MQTT, Telegraf, InfluxDB, and Grafana were used. It was implemented in a workflow that had the function of collecting sensor data, storing it in a database, and visualizing it in the form of weight and quantity. With these developed solutions, he hopes to contribute to the logistics area, in the replacement and control of materials.

402k views402k
Comments
Susmita
Susmita

Senior SRE at African Bank

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonGrafanaGrafana

Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:

  • Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
  • Able to display automation test results,
  • System monitoring / Nginx API,
  • Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.

Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.

869k views869k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Graphite
Graphite
collectd
collectd

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

collectd gathers statistics about the system it is running on and stores this information. Those statistics can then be used to find current performance bottlenecks (i.e. performance analysis) and predict future system load (i.e. capacity planning). Or if you just want pretty graphs of your private server and are fed up with some homegrown solution you're at the right place, too.

carbon - a Twisted daemon that listens for time-series data;whisper - a simple database library for storing time-series data (similar in design to RRD);graphite webapp - A Django webapp that renders graphs on-demand using Cairo
fast;simple;integrated;easy to operate
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Stars
3.3K
GitHub Forks
1.3K
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
383
Stacks
98
Followers
419
Followers
156
Votes
42
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Render any graph
  • 9
    Great functions to apply on timeseries
  • 8
    Well supported integrations
  • 6
    Includes event tracking
  • 3
    Rolling aggregation makes storage managable
Pros
  • 2
    Modular, plugins
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 1
    KISS
Integrations
Sensu
Sensu
Nagios
Nagios
Logstash
Logstash
Windows Server
Windows Server
Netdata
Netdata
Riemann
Riemann
Diamond
Diamond
Telegraf
Telegraf
Ganglia
Ganglia
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Graphite, collectd?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana