1. Consul vs. LaunchDarkly: Consul is primarily a service networking solution that focuses on service discovery and configuration while LaunchDarkly is a feature management platform that enables developers to roll out features through feature flags. 2. Deployment Approach: Consul is usually deployed on-premises or in the cloud as an infrastructure tool, whereas LaunchDarkly is a cloud-based platform accessed through APIs. 3. Target Audience: Consul targets DevOps and infrastructure teams due to its emphasis on networking and infrastructure management, while LaunchDarkly caters more towards developers and product managers for feature control and testing. 4. Pricing Model: Consul typically follows a subscription-based pricing model depending on the number of nodes in use, whereas LaunchDarkly offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of feature requests and users. 5. Main Functionality: Consul focuses on providing service discovery, health checking, and key-value storage for networking, whereas LaunchDarkly specializes in feature flags, A/B testing, and rollouts for software features. 6. Integration Capabilities: Consul offers seamless integration with various tools for infrastructure management such as Terraform and Kubernetes, whereas LaunchDarkly integrates with popular development tools like GitHub and Jira for feature rollout processes.

In Summary, Consul and LaunchDarkly offer distinct solutions tailored towards different aspects of software development, with Consul focusing on networking and infrastructure management, and LaunchDarkly specializing in feature management and testing.