StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. CouchDB vs FoundationDB

CouchDB vs FoundationDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CouchDB
CouchDB
Stacks529
Followers584
Votes139
GitHub Stars6.7K
Forks1.1K
FoundationDB
FoundationDB
Stacks34
Followers79
Votes21

CouchDB vs FoundationDB: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between CouchDB and FoundationDB are outlined below:

1. **Data Model**: CouchDB follows a document-oriented approach where data is stored in JSON documents while FoundationDB utilizes a distributed key-value store for data storage. This means that in CouchDB, data is represented as semi-structured documents with flexible schemas, whereas in FoundationDB, data is stored in key-value pairs without a predefined schema.
   
2. **Concurrency Control**: CouchDB uses a Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC) mechanism to handle concurrent read and write operations, ensuring consistency without locking entire databases. On the other hand, FoundationDB provides serializable isolation levels through its distributed storage engine, offering strong consistency guarantees across distributed transactions.

3. **Scalability**: FoundationDB is designed to scale horizontally with ease, allowing users to add more nodes to the cluster seamlessly and distribute data across machines for increased performance. In contrast, while CouchDB supports sharding for horizontal scalability, it may require more manual intervention and configuration compared to FoundationDB's automated scaling capabilities.

4. **Querying**: CouchDB uses map-reduce for querying data, which can be powerful but may require more effort to write and maintain complex queries. FoundationDB offers a SQL-like language called Flow for querying data, providing a more familiar and user-friendly way to interact with the database.

5. **Consistency Model**: CouchDB offers eventual consistency by default, allowing for fast and highly available operations across distributed nodes. FoundationDB, on the other hand, provides strong consistency guarantees out of the box, ensuring that all transactions are executed atomically and in a predictable order.

6. **Fault Tolerance**: FoundationDB is built with fault tolerance in mind, automatically handling node failures and ensuring data durability through data replication and distribution. While CouchDB also supports replication and fault tolerance mechanisms, FoundationDB's architecture is specifically designed to handle failures more efficiently and reliably.

In Summary, the key differences between CouchDB and FoundationDB lie in their data models, concurrency control mechanisms, scalability options, querying capabilities, consistency models, and fault tolerance designs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CouchDB, FoundationDB

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at Naologic

Jan 2, 2020

DecidedonCouchDBCouchDBCouchbaseCouchbaseMemcachedMemcached

We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .

Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.

It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.

592k views592k
Comments
T
T

Feb 24, 2022

Decided

I’m newbie I was developing a pouchdb and couchdb app cause if the sync. Lots of learning very little code available. I dropped the project cause it consumed my life. Yeats later I’m back into it. I researched other db and came across rethinkdb and mongo for the subscription features. With socketio I should be able to create and similar sync feature. Attempted to use mongo. I attempted to use rethink. Rethink for the win. Super clear l. I had it running in minutes on my local machine and I believe it’s supposed to scale easy. Mongo wasn’t as easy and there free online db is so slow what’s the point. Very easy to find mongo code examples and use rethink code in its place. I wish I went this route years ago. All that corporate google Amazon crap get bent. The reason they have so much power in the world is cause you guys are giving it to them.

79.7k views79.7k
Comments
Karan
Karan

Senior Software Developer at Shyplite

Jan 13, 2022

Decided

So, we started using foundationDB for an OLAP system although the inbuilt tools for some core things like aggregation and filtering were negligible, with the high through put of the DB, we were able to handle it on the application. The system has been running pretty well for the past 6 months, although the data load isn’t very high yet, the performance is fairly promising

40.9k views40.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CouchDB
CouchDB
FoundationDB
FoundationDB

Apache CouchDB is a database that uses JSON for documents, JavaScript for MapReduce indexes, and regular HTTP for its API. CouchDB is a database that completely embraces the web. Store your data with JSON documents. Access your documents and query your indexes with your web browser, via HTTP. Index, combine, and transform your documents with JavaScript.

FoundationDB is a NoSQL database with a shared nothing architecture. Designed around a "core" ordered key-value database, additional features and data models are supplied in layers. The key-value database, as well as all layers, supports full, cross-key and cross-server ACID transactions.

Terrific single-node database; Clustered database ; HTTP/JSON; Offline first data sync
Multiple data models;Full, multi-key ACID transactions;No locking;Bindings available in Python, Ruby, Node, PHP, Java, Go, and C
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
529
Stacks
34
Followers
584
Followers
79
Votes
139
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 43
    JSON
  • 30
    Open source
  • 18
    Highly available
  • 12
    Partition tolerant
  • 11
    Eventual consistency
Pros
  • 6
    ACID transactions
  • 5
    Linear scalability
  • 3
    Key-Value Store
  • 3
    Multi-model database
  • 3
    Great Foundation

What are some alternatives to CouchDB, FoundationDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase