Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

C++

16.9K
9.1K
+ 1
845
Flask

18.7K
15.8K
+ 1
82
Add tool

C++ vs Flask: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between C++ and Flask, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Syntax: C++ is a statically-typed language that uses a curly brace syntax and follows a strict set of rules for variable declaration. On the other hand, Flask is a Python-based web framework that uses a more flexible indentation-based syntax.

  2. Purpose: C++ is a general-purpose programming language designed for system-level programming, while Flask is a micro web framework specifically built for creating web applications.

  3. Memory Management: In C++, developers have direct control over memory management, allowing for manual memory allocation and deallocation using pointers. In Flask, memory management is handled automatically by the Python interpreter using a garbage collector, relieving developers from managing memory manually.

  4. Concurrency Model: C++ provides low-level concurrency support through libraries like pthreads, allowing for multithreading and parallel programming. Flask, being based on Python, uses a Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) that limits concurrent execution, making it less suitable for CPU-bound tasks compared to C++.

  5. Performance: C++ is a compiled language, which makes it highly efficient and allows for fine-tuning of code to achieve optimal performance. Flask, as an interpreted language, is generally slower than C++ and is more suited for rapid development rather than high-performance computing.

  6. Portability: C++ programs can be compiled and run on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. Flask, being a Python framework, can also run on these platforms. However, C++ has more control over low-level operations and can achieve better platform-specific optimizations compared to Flask.

Overall, C++ and Flask differ in syntax, purpose, memory management, concurrency model, performance, and portability. While C++ is widely used for system-level programming and offers better performance and control, Flask excels in creating web applications quickly and easily.

Advice on C++ and Flask
kristan-dev
Senior Solutions Analyst · | 8 upvotes · 347.3K views

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

See more
Replies (1)
Rafael Torres
Technical Lead at 4Agile · | 9 upvotes · 337.8K views

If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.

See more
Girish Sharma
Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems · | 6 upvotes · 275.2K views
Needs advice
on
BottleBottleFlaskFlask
and
NamekoNameko

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
BottleBottle

Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.

See more
Saurav Pandit
Application Devloper at Bny Mellon · | 6 upvotes · 292.5K views

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
FlaskFlask
at

For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.

See more
Decisions about C++ and Flask
Russtopia Labs
Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs · | 0 upvote · 199.1K views

As a personal research project I wanted to add post-quantum crypto KEM (key encapsulation) algorithms and new symmetric crypto session algorithms to openssh. I found the openssh code and its channel/context management extremely complex.

Concurrently, I was learning Go. It occurred to me that Go's excellent standard library, including crypto libraries, plus its much safer memory model and string/buffer handling would be better suited to a secure remote shell solution. So I started from scratch, writing a clean-room Go-based solution, without regard for ssh compatibility. Interactive and token-based login, secure copy and tunnels.

Of course, it needs a proper security audit for side channel attacks, protocol vulnerabilities and so on -- but I was impressed by how much simpler a client-server application with crypto and complex terminal handling was in Go.

$ sloc openssh-portable 
  Languages  Files    Code  Comment  Blank   Total  CodeLns
      Total    502  112982    14327  15705  143014   100.0%
          C    389  105938    13349  14416  133703    93.5%
      Shell     92    6118      937   1129    8184     5.7%
       Make     16     468       37    131     636     0.4%
        AWK      1     363        0      7     370     0.3%
        C++      3      79        4     18     101     0.1%
       Conf      1      16        0      4      20     0.0%
$ sloc xs
  Languages  Files  Code  Comment  Blank  Total  CodeLns
      Total     34  3658     1231    655   5544   100.0%
         Go     19  3230     1199    507   4936    89.0%
   Markdown      2   181        0     76    257     4.6%
       Make      7   148        4     50    202     3.6%
       YAML      1    39        0      5     44     0.8%
       Text      1    30        0      7     37     0.7%
     Modula      1    16        0      2     18     0.3%
      Shell      3    14       28      8     50     0.9%

https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of C++
Pros of Flask
  • 202
    Performance
  • 106
    Control over memory allocation
  • 97
    Cross-platform
  • 96
    Fast
  • 84
    Object oriented
  • 57
    Industry standard
  • 47
    Smart pointers
  • 37
    Templates
  • 16
    Gui toolkits
  • 16
    Raii
  • 13
    Generic programming
  • 13
    Control
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 11
    Metaprogramming
  • 9
    Hardcore
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    Full-fledged containers/collections API
  • 5
    Many large libraries
  • 4
    Performant multi-paradigm language
  • 4
    Large number of Libraries
  • 3
    Way too complicated
  • 1
    Close to Reality
  • 1
    Plenty of useful features
  • 14
    Flexibilty
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 8
    Flask
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
  • 3
    Orm
  • 2
    Secure
  • 1
    Beautiful code
  • 1
    Easy to get started
  • 1
    Easy to develop and maintain applications
  • 1
    Not JS
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Documentation
  • 1
    Python
  • 1
    Minimal
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Easy to setup and get it going
  • 1
    Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
  • 1
    Easy to integrate
  • 1
    Speed
  • 1
    Get started quickly
  • 1
    Customizable
  • 1
    Simple to use
  • 1
    Powerful
  • 1
    Rapid development
  • 0
    Open source
  • 0
    Well designed
  • 0
    Productive
  • 0
    Awesome
  • 0
    Expressive
  • 0
    Love it

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of C++
Cons of Flask
  • 8
    Slow compilation
  • 8
    Unsafe
  • 6
    Over-complicated
  • 6
    Fragile ABI
  • 5
    No standard/mainstream dependency management
  • 4
    Templates mess with compilation units
  • 3
    Too low level for most tasks
  • 1
    Compile time features are a mess
  • 1
    Template metaprogramming is insane
  • 1
    Segfaults
  • 1
    Unreal engine
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is C++?

C++ compiles directly to a machine's native code, allowing it to be one of the fastest languages in the world, if optimized.

What is Flask?

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention C++ and Flask as a desired skillset
What companies use C++?
What companies use Flask?
See which teams inside your own company are using C++ or Flask.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with C++?
What tools integrate with Flask?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

May 6 2020 at 6:34AM

Pinterest

JavaScriptC++Varnish+6
5
3365
Oct 24 2019 at 7:43PM

AppSignal

JavaScriptNode.jsJava+8
5
954
GitHubPythonNode.js+47
54
72308
GitHubSlackNGINX+15
28
20915
What are some alternatives to C++ and Flask?
C lang
Python
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
C#
C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.
JavaScript
JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
HTML5
HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.
See all alternatives