StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Crystal vs Imba vs JavaScript

Crystal vs Imba vs JavaScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JavaScript
JavaScript
Stacks392.3K
Followers284.0K
Votes8.1K
Crystal
Crystal
Stacks341
Followers350
Votes286
GitHub Stars20.0K
Forks1.7K
Imba
Imba
Stacks19
Followers40
Votes0

Crystal vs Imba vs JavaScript: What are the differences?

<Crystal, Imba, and JavaScript are three popular programming languages that serve different purposes in web development. In this analysis, we will explore the key differences between Crystal, Imba, and JavaScript.>

  1. Syntax: Crystal has a syntax that closely resembles Ruby, providing a more readable and concise codebase, while Imba offers a simplified syntax compared to JavaScript, making it easier to write and maintain large-scale applications. On the other hand, JavaScript has a more verbose syntax, which can sometimes lead to confusion and errors in code.

  2. Performance: Crystal is known for its high performance due to static type checking and compilation to native code, making it suitable for high-throughput applications. Imba offers excellent performance by leveraging a virtual DOM for efficient updates, enhancing the rendering speed of web applications. In comparison, JavaScript's performance can vary depending on the browser and the execution environment, leading to potential performance bottlenecks.

  3. Tooling: Crystal provides a comprehensive set of tools for debugging, profiling, and testing applications, which contributes to a smoother development process. Imba offers an integrated development environment (IDE) for seamless coding and real-time feedback, improving developer productivity. JavaScript has a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries, but the fragmented nature of the JavaScript community can lead to challenges in selecting the right tools for specific use cases.

  4. Concurrency: Crystal has built-in support for lightweight green threads, enabling developers to write concurrent code with ease and efficiency. Imba leverages a message-passing model for concurrency, simplifying the handling of parallel tasks in web applications. In contrast, JavaScript relies on asynchronous programming techniques such as callbacks, promises, and async/await to achieve concurrency, which can sometimes result in callback hell and complex code patterns.

  5. Native Development: Crystal allows developers to build native applications for different platforms by compiling the code directly to machine code, offering a performance advantage over other languages. Imba supports the creation of native web components that can be seamlessly integrated into existing web applications, enhancing the user experience. JavaScript, in combination with frameworks like React Native, enables the development of mobile applications using web technologies, providing a cross-platform solution for building native apps.

  6. Type System: Crystal features a strong static type system that helps catch errors at compile time, reducing the likelihood of runtime errors and improving code reliability. Imba introduces a hybrid type system that combines static typing with type inference, offering a balance between type safety and developer productivity. JavaScript, being a dynamically typed language, allows for more flexibility in coding but can lead to unexpected runtime errors if not handled properly.

In Summary, the key differences between Crystal, Imba, and JavaScript lie in their syntax, performance, tooling, concurrency models, support for native development, and type systems, each offering unique benefits and trade-offs for developers in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on JavaScript, Crystal, Imba

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

447k views447k
Comments
Nathan
Nathan

Fullstack Developer at Alpsify

Sep 23, 2020

Needs advice

Am I the only one to think that libraries like Bootstrap, Vuetify, Materialize, Foundation are too much sometimes ?

Most of the time you are loading all the library and using 10% of it. And on that 10% you are modifying 90% of it.

I feel like using grid and pure CSS / JS are enough and cleaner.

101k views101k
Comments
Muhamed
Muhamed

Apr 28, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptDjangoDjango

I am currently learning web development with Python and JavaScript course by CS50 Harvard university. It covers python, Flask, Django, SQL, Travis CI, javascript,HTML ,CSS and more. I am very interested in Flutter app development. Can I know what is the difference between learning these above-mentioned frameworks vs learning flutter directly? I am planning to learn flutter so that I can do both web development and app development. Are there any perks of learning these frameworks before flutter?

737k views737k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

JavaScript
JavaScript
Crystal
Crystal
Imba
Imba

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Crystal is a programming language that resembles Ruby but compiles to native code and tries to be much more efficient, at the cost of disallowing certain dynamic aspects of Ruby.

Imba is a new programming language for the web that compiles to performant and readable JavaScript. It has language level support for defining, extending, subclassing, instantiating and rendering dom nodes.

-
Ruby-inspired syntax.;Statically type-checked but without having to specify the type of variables or method arguments.;Be able to call C code by writing bindings to it in Crystal.;Have compile-time evaluation and generation of code, to avoid boilerplate code.;Compile to efficient native code.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
20.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
392.3K
Stacks
341
Stacks
19
Followers
284.0K
Followers
350
Followers
40
Votes
8.1K
Votes
286
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1671
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1497
    It's everywhere
  • 1163
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 899
    Fast
  • 746
    Light weight
Cons
  • 24
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 16
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 9
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 8
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
Pros
  • 38
    Compiles to efficient native code
  • 36
    Ruby inspired syntax
  • 32
    Performance oriented - C-like speeds
  • 23
    Gem-like packages, called Shards
  • 20
    Can call C code using Crystal bindings
Cons
  • 13
    Small community
  • 3
    No windows support
  • 1
    No Oracle lib
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to JavaScript, Crystal, Imba?

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase