Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Dancer

38
33
+ 1
4
Flask

18.7K
15.8K
+ 1
82
Add tool

Dancer vs Flask: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Dancer and Flask are both popular web frameworks in their respective programming languages. Below are the key differences between Dancer and Flask.

1. **Language**:
Dancer is a Perl-based web framework while Flask is Python-based. This means that developers who are more comfortable with Perl may prefer Dancer, while those proficient in Python may lean towards Flask for their web development projects.

2. **Community Support**:
Flask has a larger and more active community compared to Dancer. This results in a wider range of resources, documentation, and third-party plugins available for Flask, making it easier for developers to find solutions and assistance when using this framework.

3. **Philosophy**:
Flask adheres to the principle of minimalism and simplicity, providing developers with the essential tools to build web applications. Dancer, on the other hand, aims to offer a more comprehensive and feature-rich framework that includes various built-in functionalities and modules.

4. **Template Engine**:
Dancer uses the Template Toolkit for its templating engine, which allows for more complex template functionalities and features. Flask, on the other hand, relies on Jinja2 for its templates, which emphasizes simplicity and ease of use.

5. **Ease of Learning**:
Flask is known for its beginner-friendly nature and ease of learning, making it a preferred choice for developers who are new to web development. Dancer, while not overly complex, may have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with Perl or its conventions.

6. **Scalability**:
Flask is often considered more scalable and suitable for larger projects due to its modular design and flexibility in handling increasing complexity. Dancer, while capable of handling a range of project sizes, may require more effort to scale up efficiently compared to Flask.

In Summary, Dancer and Flask differ in terms of language, community support, philosophy, template engine, ease of learning, and scalability, catering to different preferences and requirements of developers. 
Advice on Dancer and Flask
kristan-dev
Senior Solutions Analyst · | 8 upvotes · 347.2K views

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

See more
Replies (1)
Rafael Torres
Technical Lead at 4Agile · | 9 upvotes · 337.7K views

If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.

See more
Girish Sharma
Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems · | 6 upvotes · 275.2K views
Needs advice
on
BottleBottleFlaskFlask
and
NamekoNameko

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
BottleBottle

Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.

See more
Saurav Pandit
Application Devloper at Bny Mellon · | 6 upvotes · 292.5K views

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
FlaskFlask
at

For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Dancer
Pros of Flask
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Easy
  • 1
    Stable
  • 1
    Microframework
  • 14
    Flexibilty
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 8
    Flask
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
  • 3
    Orm
  • 2
    Secure
  • 1
    Beautiful code
  • 1
    Easy to get started
  • 1
    Easy to develop and maintain applications
  • 1
    Not JS
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Documentation
  • 1
    Python
  • 1
    Minimal
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Easy to setup and get it going
  • 1
    Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
  • 1
    Easy to integrate
  • 1
    Speed
  • 1
    Get started quickly
  • 1
    Customizable
  • 1
    Simple to use
  • 1
    Powerful
  • 1
    Rapid development
  • 0
    Open source
  • 0
    Well designed
  • 0
    Productive
  • 0
    Awesome
  • 0
    Expressive
  • 0
    Love it

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Dancer
Cons of Flask
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 10
      Not JS
    • 7
      Context
    • 5
      Not fast
    • 1
      Don't has many module as in spring

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Dancer?

    Dancer is a free and open source micro web application framework written in Perl.

    What is Flask?

    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Dancer and Flask as a desired skillset
    What companies use Dancer?
    What companies use Flask?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Dancer or Flask.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Dancer?
    What tools integrate with Flask?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Dancer and Flask?
    Mover
    Mover is the best way to migrate or back up files between cloud storage providers and traditional servers. We connect to services like Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, OneDrive, FTP, WebDAV, S3 and many others.
    Mojolicious
    Back in the early days of the web, many people learned Perl because of a wonderful Perl library called CGI. It was simple enough to get started without knowing much about the language and powerful enough to keep you going, learning by doing was much fun. While most of the techniques used are outdated now, the idea behind it is not. Mojolicious is a new attempt at implementing this idea using state of the art technology.
    Node.js
    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
    Django
    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
    ASP.NET
    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.
    See all alternatives