Deno vs PDF.js

Overview

PDF.js

Stacks241

Followers86

Votes0

GitHub Stars52.2K

Forks10.5K

Deno

Stacks364

Followers474

Votes93

Deno vs PDF.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deno and PDF.js are two popular technologies used in web development. While Deno is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript, PDF.js is a JavaScript library for rendering PDF documents in the browser. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Deno and PDF.js.

Language Supported:
- Deno supports both JavaScript and TypeScript, allowing developers to write code in either language.
- PDF.js is primarily focused on JavaScript and is specifically designed to work with PDF documents.
Runtime Environment:
- Deno provides a secure runtime environment for executing JavaScript and TypeScript code. It has security features like permissions-based access to resources and sandboxed execution.
- PDF.js, on the other hand, is a library that runs within the browser environment. It does not provide a separate runtime environment like Deno.
Functionality:
- Deno offers a wide range of functionalities beyond just executing scripts, including built-in module system, file system access, HTTP/HTTPS requests, and more.
- PDF.js is specifically designed to render PDF documents in the browser. It provides features like text extraction, search functionality, annotation support, and page rendering.
Security Model:
- Deno has a security model that allows or restricts access to resources based on permissions. It provides fine-grained control over file system access, network access, and other resources.
- PDF.js, being a library running within the browser, operates under the security model enforced by the browser itself. It does not have the same level of control over resource access as Deno.
Development Community:
- The Deno community is still growing and has a smaller user base compared to PDF.js.
- PDF.js has been around for a longer time and has a large and active community of developers. It has been widely adopted and is used in various applications.
Use Cases:
- Deno can be used for building various types of applications, ranging from simple scripts to complex web servers and APIs.
- PDF.js is primarily used for handling PDF documents in web applications, allowing developers to render, manipulate, and interact with PDF files.

In summary, Deno and PDF.js differ in terms of the supported languages, runtime environment, functionality, security model, development community, and use cases. Deno offers a secure runtime for executing JavaScript and TypeScript code with advanced features, while PDF.js is a JavaScript library designed specifically for working with PDF documents in the browser.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

PDF.js	Deno
It is a Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer that is built with HTML5. It is community-driven and supported by Mozilla Labs. The goal is to create a general-purpose, web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs.	It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.
General-purpose;Platform for parsing and rendering PDFs;Built with HTML5	Dependency inspector ; Code formatter; Bundling ; Runtime type info
Statistics
GitHub Stars 52.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 10.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 241	Stacks 364
Followers 86	Followers 474
Votes 0	Votes 93
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 18 Typescript 14 Secure 13 Open source 9 Great std library 9 Javascript Cons 3 Still in early development 1 Bad Rust plugin support
Integrations
HTML5 JavaScript Firefox Google Chrome	JavaScript Mac OS X TypeScript Rust Windows Linux

What are some alternatives to PDF.js, Deno?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Deno vs PDF.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Language Supported:
- Deno supports both JavaScript and TypeScript, allowing developers to write code in either language.
- PDF.js is primarily focused on JavaScript and is specifically designed to work with PDF documents.
Runtime Environment:
- Deno provides a secure runtime environment for executing JavaScript and TypeScript code. It has security features like permissions-based access to resources and sandboxed execution.
- PDF.js, on the other hand, is a library that runs within the browser environment. It does not provide a separate runtime environment like Deno.
Functionality:
- Deno offers a wide range of functionalities beyond just executing scripts, including built-in module system, file system access, HTTP/HTTPS requests, and more.
- PDF.js is specifically designed to render PDF documents in the browser. It provides features like text extraction, search functionality, annotation support, and page rendering.
Security Model:
- Deno has a security model that allows or restricts access to resources based on permissions. It provides fine-grained control over file system access, network access, and other resources.
- PDF.js, being a library running within the browser, operates under the security model enforced by the browser itself. It does not have the same level of control over resource access as Deno.
Development Community:
- The Deno community is still growing and has a smaller user base compared to PDF.js.
- PDF.js has been around for a longer time and has a large and active community of developers. It has been widely adopted and is used in various applications.
Use Cases:
- Deno can be used for building various types of applications, ranging from simple scripts to complex web servers and APIs.
- PDF.js is primarily used for handling PDF documents in web applications, allowing developers to render, manipulate, and interact with PDF files.

Deno vs PDF.js

Overview

Deno vs PDF.js: What are the differences?