StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. DigitalOcean Spaces vs Google Cloud Storage

DigitalOcean Spaces vs Google Cloud Storage

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes75
DigitalOcean Spaces
DigitalOcean Spaces
Stacks87
Followers99
Votes5

DigitalOcean Spaces vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Introduction

DigitalOcean Spaces and Google Cloud Storage are two popular cloud storage solutions that offer scalable and reliable storage for various data types. While they have similar goals, there are key differences between the two platforms that set them apart. This article will explore these differences and provide a brief comparison between DigitalOcean Spaces and Google Cloud Storage.

  1. Pricing Model: DigitalOcean Spaces offers a simple and predictable pricing model with a flat fee for storage and bandwidth usage. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage provides a more complex pricing structure based on storage classes, retrieval options, network egress, and other factors. This makes it important for users to carefully consider their usage patterns to determine the most cost-effective option.

  2. Integration and Ecosystem: Google Cloud Storage is part of the Google Cloud Platform ecosystem, which offers a wide range of services and integrations with other Google services like BigQuery, Cloud Functions, and Dataflow. DigitalOcean Spaces, while not having the same level of integration, provides straightforward documentation and SDKs for integration with popular programming languages and frameworks.

  3. Geographical Availability: Google Cloud Storage has a more extensive global footprint with multiple storage regions and availability zones across the world. This allows users to store their data closer to their target audience for reduced latency and improved performance. DigitalOcean Spaces, however, currently offers storage only in the United States, which can be a limiting factor for users with specific geographical requirements.

  4. Object Lifecycle Management: Google Cloud Storage offers advanced object lifecycle management features, allowing users to define rules to automatically transition objects between storage classes based on their age or usage patterns. DigitalOcean Spaces, on the other hand, lacks these advanced lifecycle management capabilities, offering only simple storage and retrieval options.

  5. Access Control and Security: Both DigitalOcean Spaces and Google Cloud Storage offer various access control mechanisms to secure data, including access keys, IAM policies, and bucket-level permissions. However, Google Cloud Storage provides more granular control over access permissions with support for fine-grained access control lists (ACLs) and IAM roles. This can be crucial for organizations with complex security requirements.

  6. Data Transfer and Performance: Google Cloud Storage boasts a global network infrastructure that ensures high-speed data transfer and low latency for users around the world. With its distributed architecture, DigitalOcean Spaces may face limitations in terms of data transfer speeds, especially for users located far away from their data centers.

In summary, DigitalOcean Spaces and Google Cloud Storage differ in terms of pricing model, integration and ecosystem, geographical availability, object lifecycle management, access control and security, and data transfer performance. Users should evaluate these differences based on their specific needs and requirements to choose the most suitable cloud storage solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, DigitalOcean Spaces

Mohammad
Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceonBackblaze B2 Cloud StorageBackblaze B2 Cloud StoragePHPPHPLaravelLaravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

  • Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?

  • DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure

  • Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.

  • Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.

  • There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k
Comments
Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
DigitalOcean Spaces
DigitalOcean Spaces

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing
Create Spaces in an instant;Scalable storage;Available as a standalone service; Simple drag-and-drop UI;Programmatically control and migrate your data;Backups;Logs;Archives
Statistics
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
87
Followers
1.2K
Followers
99
Votes
75
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 19
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
Pros
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Cheap
Integrations
No integrations available
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, DigitalOcean Spaces?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase