Django Channels vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
Django Channels: It extends Django's abilities beyond HTTP - to handle WebSockets, chat protocols, IoT protocols. It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style; Phalcon: Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP. Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
Django Channels and Phalcon belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.
Django Channels and Phalcon are both open source tools. It seems that Phalcon with 9.77K GitHub stars and 1.78K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Django Channels with 3.94K GitHub stars and 542 GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Phalcon has a broader approval, being mentioned in 31 company stacks & 134 developers stacks; compared to Django Channels, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.
What is Django Channels?
What is Phalcon?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Django Channels?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Django Channels?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Django Channels?
'm a professional web developer from Vietnam with B.S Physics and Engineering. I'm a Phalcon enthusiast as Opensource. In free time, I was support on forum Phalcon also my forum and contribution core Phalcon.
I think precompiled PHP is the way to go. It saves CPU cycles, RAM and overall I/O. It saves money too. Smaller requirements = smaller bills.
I've tried symfony and zend. Phalcon was easiest to use.