Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docker

111.7K
88.5K
+ 1
3.8K
Snap CI

29
55
+ 1
100
Add tool

Docker vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

Docker: Enterprise Container Platform for High-Velocity Innovation. The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere; Snap CI: Build, test, and deploy software faster with Snap's continuous integration and deployment tool. Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Docker can be classified as a tool in the "Virtual Machine Platforms & Containers" category, while Snap CI is grouped under "Continuous Integration".

Some of the features offered by Docker are:

  • Integrated developer tools
  • open, portable images
  • shareable, reusable apps

On the other hand, Snap CI provides the following key features:

  • Deployment Options - Heroku, AWS
  • System Libraries - Your build runs on a RedHat 6-compatible system with commonly required libraries
  • Customization Options - In addition to all that we support out of the box, we offer you the chance to customize your build extensively.

"Rapid integration and build up" is the top reason why over 815 developers like Docker, while over 13 developers mention "Github integration" as the leading cause for choosing Snap CI.

Docker is an open source tool with 53.8K GitHub stars and 15.5K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Docker's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Docker has a broader approval, being mentioned in 3471 company stacks & 3322 developers stacks; compared to Snap CI, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Decisions about Docker and Snap CI
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 2 upvotes · 199.4K views
Chose
LXD
over
Docker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Docker
Pros of Snap CI
  • 821
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 688
    Isolation
  • 517
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 459
    Lightweight
  • 217
    Standardization
  • 182
    Scalable
  • 105
    Upgrading / down­grad­ing / ap­pli­ca­tion versions
  • 86
    Security
  • 84
    Private paas environments
  • 33
    Portability
  • 25
    Limit resource usage
  • 15
    I love the way docker has changed virtualization
  • 15
    Game changer
  • 12
    Fast
  • 11
    Concurrency
  • 7
    Docker's Compose tools
  • 4
    Fast and Portable
  • 4
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Because its fun
  • 3
    Makes shipping to production very simple
  • 2
    It's dope
  • 1
    Highly useful
  • 1
    MacOS support FAKE
  • 1
    Its cool
  • 1
    Docker hub for the FTW
  • 1
    Very easy to setup integrate and build
  • 1
    Package the environment with the application
  • 1
    Does a nice job hogging memory
  • 1
    Open source and highly configurable
  • 1
    Simplicity, isolation, resource effective
  • 14
    Github integration
  • 13
    Easy setup
  • 11
    Multi-stage pipelines
  • 10
    Continuous deployment
  • 9
    Easy ui
  • 9
    Great customer support
  • 8
    Automatic branch tracking
  • 7
    Automated and manual deploys
  • 5
    Console debugging
  • 5
    Pull request integration
  • 4
    Continuous delivery
  • 3
    Free for open-source
  • 2
    Better PR support

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docker
Cons of Snap CI
  • 7
    New versions == broken features
  • 5
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 5
    Unreliable networking
  • 3
    Moves quickly
  • 2
    Not Secure
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What companies use Docker?
    What companies use Snap CI?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Docker or Snap CI.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docker?
    What tools integrate with Snap CI?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Docker and Snap CI?
    LXC
    LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.
    rkt
    Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Cloud Foundry
    Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
    Vagrant
    Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.
    See all alternatives