StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Orm
  5. Doctrine 2 vs Propel ORM

Doctrine 2 vs Propel ORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Doctrine 2
Doctrine 2
Stacks284
Followers207
Votes31
Propel ORM
Propel ORM
Stacks7
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks400

Doctrine 2 vs Propel ORM: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In the world of PHP, two popular Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tools are Doctrine 2 and Propel ORM. While both serve the purpose of mapping database tables to PHP objects, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. **Architecture**:
Doctrine 2 follows the Data Mapper pattern, where the domain objects are not responsible for their own persistence logic, while Propel uses the Active Record pattern, where the domain objects themselves handle interactions with the database.

2. **Query Language**:
Doctrine 2 uses DQL (Doctrine Query Language), which is object-oriented and designed for complex queries with joins and subqueries. In contrast, Propel ORM offers a query-building mechanism that resembles SQL and allows for easier integration and migration from traditional SQL queries.

3. **Mapping Strategy**:
Doctrine 2 employs XML, YAML, or annotations to define the mappings between database tables and PHP objects, providing flexibility and ease in configuration. Propel ORM, on the other hand, primarily uses XML for mapping, offering a more structured approach to defining database mappings.

4. **Community Support**:
Doctrine 2 has a larger and more active community compared to Propel ORM, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support forums. Propel ORM, while having a dedicated user base, might have slightly fewer resources and support options available.

5. **Performance**:
Doctrine 2 is known for its advanced caching mechanisms and lazy loading capabilities, which can improve performance in scenarios with complex object graphs. Propel ORM, while efficient, may not offer the same level of performance optimizations out of the box.

6. **Tooling and Integration**:
Doctrine 2 offers robust integration with Symfony and other PHP frameworks, with a wide range of tools and plugins available for seamless development. Propel ORM, while compatible with various frameworks, might require additional configurations or adaptations for full integration.

# Summary
In summary, the key differences between Doctrine 2 and Propel ORM lie in their architecture, query language, mapping strategies, community support, performance optimizations, and tooling/integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Doctrine 2
Doctrine 2
Propel ORM
Propel ORM

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

It is an open-source Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) for SQL-Databases in PHP 5.5. It allows you to access your database using a set of objects, providing a simple API for storing and retrieving data.

-
Highly customizable and blazing fast; ORM library for PHP 5.5+; Supports schema migration for MySQL, SQLite and PostgreSQL; For existing database structures we support reverse enginering of your current database schema; generates all of your getter and setter as well as filter, relation methods and much more for you
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
400
Stacks
284
Stacks
7
Followers
207
Followers
5
Votes
31
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Great abstraction, easy to use, good docs
  • 10
    Object-Oriented
  • 7
    Easy setup
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Oracle
Oracle
PHP
PHP
SQLite
SQLite
MSSQL
MSSQL
MySQL
MySQL

What are some alternatives to Doctrine 2, Propel ORM?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase