DodgerCMS vs Jekyll

Overview

Jekyll

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.4K

Votes230

GitHub Stars51.0K

Forks10.2K

DodgerCMS

Stacks4

Followers10

Votes0

GitHub Stars299

Forks37

DodgerCMS vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Hosting: DodgerCMS requires a server to host the content, while Jekyll can be hosted on platforms like GitHub Pages without the need for a server.
Content Management: DodgerCMS provides a user-friendly interface for managing content, allowing users to make edits and updates directly through the platform. Jekyll relies on writing content in Markdown files and pushing changes through version control systems.
Themes and Templates: DodgerCMS offers limited flexibility in terms of themes and templates compared to Jekyll, which has a wide range of pre-designed themes and templates available for customization.
Static Site Generation: Jekyll generates static HTML files at build time, while DodgerCMS dynamically renders content when requested, potentially affecting site performance and load times.
Community Support: Jekyll has a large and active community that provides support, plugins, and extensions, while DodgerCMS has a smaller community with fewer resources available for troubleshooting and development.
Custom Plugins and Extensions: Jekyll allows users to build and use custom plugins to extend functionality, while DodgerCMS has limited support for creating custom plugins and extensions.

In Summary, DodgerCMS and Jekyll differ in hosting requirements, content management interfaces, theme flexibility, site generation methods, community support, and custom plugin capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jekyll, DodgerCMS

Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k

Comments

Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.5k views53.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jekyll	DodgerCMS
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.	DodgerCMS is a static markdown CMS built on top of Amazon S3. It is a clean and simple alternative to heavy content management systems. There are no databases to manage, deployments to monitor, or massive configuration files. Just focus on writing your content and the results are live immediately.
Simple - No more databases, comment moderation, or pesky updates to install—just your content.;Static - Markdown (or Textile), Liquid, HTML & CSS go in. Static sites come out ready for deployment.;Blog-aware - Permalinks, categories, pages, posts, and custom layouts are all first-class citizens here.	Full markdown editor;Simple toolbar and easy file manipulation;Github flavored markdown with syntax highlighting;Upload images directly to the cloud;Upload and insert images directly into your document;Handle changes in url structure automatically;Changes made to url's are recorded and stored in a JSON file you can use to build complex navigation;Access via your S3 bucket;Turn the manger into a static website and access from anywhere;Custom layouts;The front end design can be altered in any way to suit your specific needs;Simple to modify HTML, CSS and JS;Live updates;Changes to entries take affect immediately;No deployments or file uploads necessary
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.0K	GitHub Stars 299
GitHub Forks 10.2K	GitHub Forks 37
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 4
Followers 1.4K	Followers 10
Votes 230	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 74 Github pages integration 54 Open source 37 It's slick, customisable and hackerish 24 Easy to deploy 23 Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset Cons 4 Build time increases exponentially as site grows 2 Lack of developments lately 1 Og doesn't work with postings dynamically	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon S3 Markdown

What are some alternatives to Jekyll, DodgerCMS?

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

DodgerCMS vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Hosting: DodgerCMS requires a server to host the content, while Jekyll can be hosted on platforms like GitHub Pages without the need for a server.
Content Management: DodgerCMS provides a user-friendly interface for managing content, allowing users to make edits and updates directly through the platform. Jekyll relies on writing content in Markdown files and pushing changes through version control systems.
Themes and Templates: DodgerCMS offers limited flexibility in terms of themes and templates compared to Jekyll, which has a wide range of pre-designed themes and templates available for customization.
Static Site Generation: Jekyll generates static HTML files at build time, while DodgerCMS dynamically renders content when requested, potentially affecting site performance and load times.
Community Support: Jekyll has a large and active community that provides support, plugins, and extensions, while DodgerCMS has a smaller community with fewer resources available for troubleshooting and development.
Custom Plugins and Extensions: Jekyll allows users to build and use custom plugins to extend functionality, while DodgerCMS has limited support for creating custom plugins and extensions.

In Summary, DodgerCMS and Jekyll differ in hosting requirements, content management interfaces, theme flexibility, site generation methods, community support, and custom plugin capabilities.

DodgerCMS vs Jekyll

Overview