StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Dojo vs React

Dojo vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Dojo
Dojo
Stacks568
Followers96
Votes1

Dojo vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

Dojo and React are both popular JavaScript libraries used for building user interfaces. While they have some similarities, they also have several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Dojo and React.

  1. Design Philosophy:

Dojo follows a more traditional approach to building web applications, with a focus on modular and reusable components. It provides a comprehensive set of tools and libraries for building large-scale applications. On the other hand, React is a JavaScript library that was specifically designed for building user interfaces, with a focus on component reusability and simplicity.

  1. Virtual DOM vs. Actual DOM:

React uses a virtual DOM, which is an abstraction of the actual DOM. This allows React to efficiently update only the components that have changed, resulting in better performance. Dojo, on the other hand, interacts directly with the actual DOM, which may lead to more frequent updates and potentially slower performance.

  1. Component Architecture:

React follows a component-based architecture, where the user interface is divided into reusable, modular components. These components can be nested and composed together to build complex user interfaces. Dojo also follows a component architecture, but it provides more flexibility in terms of the underlying widget system and allows for different approaches to structuring the application.

  1. State Management:

React has built-in support for managing application state through the use of the "useState" and "useReducer" hooks. This allows developers to easily update and manage the state of their components. Dojo, on the other hand, provides its own state management solution called "stores", which is based on the Flux architecture. While both approaches have their pros and cons, React's state management is generally considered more straightforward and easier to use.

  1. Community and Ecosystem:

React has a larger and more active community compared to Dojo. This means that there are more resources, tutorials, and libraries available for React developers. React also has a richer ecosystem with a wide range of third-party libraries and tools. Dojo, although less popular, still has a dedicated community and a set of extensions and plugins available.

  1. Learning Curve and Complexity:

React has a relatively low learning curve, especially for developers familiar with JavaScript and HTML. Its simplicity and declarative nature make it easy to understand and start building applications quickly. Dojo, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its more comprehensive and feature-rich nature. It requires a deeper understanding of concepts like modules, widgets, and stores.

In summary, Dojo and React have different design philosophies, approaches to managing the DOM, component architectures, state management solutions, and communities. React is known for its simplicity, virtual DOM, and extensive ecosystem, while Dojo offers a more comprehensive set of tools and flexibility in terms of the underlying architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Dojo

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Dojo
Dojo

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a JavaScript toolkit that saves you time and scales with your development process. Provides everything you need to build a Web app. Language utilities, UI components, and more, all in one place, designed to work together perfectly.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Breadth and Depth: Dojo is the “full stack”;Quality: Infrastructure for internationalization and accessibility is woven through the entire fabric of Dojo;Performance: Dojo is used on high-profile, high-traffic sites every day and Dojo's build tools are a key reason why;Community: Dojo is an open community.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
568
Followers
147.0K
Followers
96
Votes
4.1K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 1
    Good for very complex forms
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
jQuery
jQuery

What are some alternatives to React, Dojo?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase