.NET Core vs Rocket

Overview

Rocket

Stacks91

Followers176

Votes12

.NET Core

Stacks7.0K

Followers2.6K

Votes155

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

.NET Core vs Rocket: What are the differences?

Developers describe .NET Core as "An Open Source, General-Purpose Development Platform Maintained by Microsoft and the .NET Community". Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications. On the other hand, Rocket is detailed as "Web Framework for Rust". Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.

.NET Core and Rocket belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

"Great performance" is the primary reason why developers consider .NET Core over the competitors, whereas "Uses all the rust features extensively" was stated as the key factor in picking Rocket.

.NET Core and Rocket are both open source tools. It seems that .NET Core with 11.2K GitHub stars and 2.41K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Rocket with 7.43K GitHub stars and 501 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Rocket, .NET Core

Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k

Comments

Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rocket	.NET Core
Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.	Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible	Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 21.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.9K
Stacks 91	Stacks 7.0K
Followers 176	Followers 2.6K
Votes 12	Votes 155
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Easy to use 4 Uses all the rust features extensively 1 Provides nice abstractions 1 Django analog in rust 1 Inbuilt templating feature Cons 1 Only runs in nightly	Pros 30 Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff 27 Fast 26 Cross-platform 25 Great performance 18 It promotes better codebase architectures and organizat
Integrations
Rust	Linux C# Visual Studio Code Sublime Text .NET Visual Studio ASP.NET Vim Visual Basic F#

What are some alternatives to Rocket, .NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

.NET Core vs Rocket