.NET vs Ember.js

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.4K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Ember.js

Stacks1.6K

Followers865

Votes775

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks4.2K

.NET vs Ember.js: What are the differences?

Language and Platform: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft, primarily using languages such as C# and VB.NET, supporting various languages, while Ember.js is a JavaScript front-end framework. .NET is more versatile, covering backend and frontend development, compared to Ember.js, which focuses solely on frontend development.
Community and Ecosystem: .NET has a vast community and ecosystem backed by Microsoft, providing extensive documentation, libraries, and support. In contrast, Ember.js has a smaller community but is suitable for rapid prototyping and efficient development, particularly for large-scale single-page applications.
Learning Curve and Complexity: .NET is known for its complexity, requiring a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and capabilities. Ember.js, on the other hand, has a more structured and opinionated approach, simplifying development for beginners but limiting flexibility for advanced users.
Deployment and Scalability: .NET applications can be deployed on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, with support for cloud deployment through Azure. Ember.js applications are typically deployed on static hosting or CDN, making them easier to scale for high traffic but may have limitations in backend integration and customization.
Data Binding and Rendering: .NET offers robust data binding capabilities through frameworks like ASP.NET MVC and Blazor, providing efficient server-side rendering and seamless integration with databases. Ember.js excels in client-side rendering and reactive data binding, enabling dynamic UI updates without frequent server requests, ideal for real-time applications.
Testing and Debugging: .NET provides comprehensive testing tools like NUnit and Visual Studio for unit testing, integration testing, and debugging, ensuring code reliability and performance optimization. Ember.js has built-in testing support with tools like QUnit and Ember-CLI, simplifying the testing process for front-end components and behavior-driven development.

In Summary, .NET and Ember.js differ in language/platform support, community, learning curve, deployment/scalability, data binding/rendering, and testing/debugging approaches.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, Ember.js

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	Ember.js
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	Creating web apps;Building UI
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars 22.6K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 4.2K
Stacks 15.4K	Stacks 1.6K
Followers 5.9K	Followers 865
Votes 1.9K	Votes 775
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft dependable systems 8 Microsoft itself 5 Hard learning curve	Pros 126 Elegant 97 Quick to develop 83 Great mvc 82 Great community 73 Great router Cons 2 Very little flexibility 2 Too much convention, too little configuration 1 Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps 1 Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	Node.js AngularJS Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to .NET, Ember.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

.NET vs Ember.js: What are the differences?

Language and Platform: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft, primarily using languages such as C# and VB.NET, supporting various languages, while Ember.js is a JavaScript front-end framework. .NET is more versatile, covering backend and frontend development, compared to Ember.js, which focuses solely on frontend development.
Community and Ecosystem: .NET has a vast community and ecosystem backed by Microsoft, providing extensive documentation, libraries, and support. In contrast, Ember.js has a smaller community but is suitable for rapid prototyping and efficient development, particularly for large-scale single-page applications.
Learning Curve and Complexity: .NET is known for its complexity, requiring a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and capabilities. Ember.js, on the other hand, has a more structured and opinionated approach, simplifying development for beginners but limiting flexibility for advanced users.
Deployment and Scalability: .NET applications can be deployed on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, with support for cloud deployment through Azure. Ember.js applications are typically deployed on static hosting or CDN, making them easier to scale for high traffic but may have limitations in backend integration and customization.
Data Binding and Rendering: .NET offers robust data binding capabilities through frameworks like ASP.NET MVC and Blazor, providing efficient server-side rendering and seamless integration with databases. Ember.js excels in client-side rendering and reactive data binding, enabling dynamic UI updates without frequent server requests, ideal for real-time applications.
Testing and Debugging: .NET provides comprehensive testing tools like NUnit and Visual Studio for unit testing, integration testing, and debugging, ensuring code reliability and performance optimization. Ember.js has built-in testing support with tools like QUnit and Ember-CLI, simplifying the testing process for front-end components and behavior-driven development.

In Summary, .NET and Ember.js differ in language/platform support, community, learning curve, deployment/scalability, data binding/rendering, and testing/debugging approaches.

.NET vs Ember.js

Overview