Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
.NET vs Sails.js: What are the differences?
### Introduction
Key differences between .NET and Sails.js are outlined below.
1. **Language used**: .NET is primarily used with C# language while Sails.js is based on Node.js and JavaScript programming language.
2. **Architecture**: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft for building web applications, while Sails.js is a web application framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern.
3. **Community Support**: .NET has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and support from Microsoft. Sails.js also has a strong community support but may not be as extensive as .NET.
4. **Scalability**: .NET can handle large and complex applications easily, making it suitable for enterprise-level projects. Sails.js is more lightweight and may be better suited for smaller or medium-sized projects.
5. **Integration**: .NET provides seamless integration with other Microsoft products and services, whereas Sails.js is more flexible in terms of integration with different databases, APIs, and third-party services.
6. **Learning Curve**: .NET may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its extensive features and functionalities, while Sails.js is relatively easier to grasp and get started with for developers familiar with JavaScript and Node.js.
### In Summary, .NET and Sails.js have distinct differences in terms of language, architecture, community support, scalability, integration, and learning curve.
I was considering focusing on learning RoR and looking for a work that uses those techs.
After some investigation, I decided to stay with C# .NET:
It is more requested on job positions (7 to 1 in my personal searches average).
It's been around for longer.
it has better documentation and community.
One of Ruby advantages (its amazing community gems, that allows to quickly build parts of your systems by merely putting together third party components) gets quite complicated to use and maintain in huge applications, where building and reusing your own components may become a better approach.
Rail's front end support is starting to waver.
C# .NET code is far easier to understand, debug and maintain. Although certainly not easier to learn from scratch.
Though Rails has an excellent programming speed, C# tends to get the upper hand in long term projects.
I would avise to stick to rails when building small projects, and switching to C# for more long term ones.
Opinions are welcome!
Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.
Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.
Pros of .NET
- Tight integration with visual studio273
- Stable code261
- Great community191
- Reliable and strongly typed server side language.183
- Microsoft141
- Fantastic documentation120
- Great 3rd party libraries90
- Speedy81
- Great azure integration71
- Great support63
- C#34
- Highly productive34
- Linq34
- High Performance31
- Great programming languages (C#, VB)28
- Open source26
- Powerful Web application framework (ASP.NET MVC)19
- Clean markup with razor16
- Fast16
- Powerful ORM (EntityFramework)15
- Dependency injection14
- Visual studio + Resharper = <310
- Constantly improving to keep up with new trends10
- High-Performance9
- Security8
- TFS8
- Job opportunities7
- Integrated and Reliable7
- Huge ecosystem and communities7
- Light-weight6
- Lovely6
- Asynchrony5
- Variations5
- {get; set;}5
- Default Debuging tools4
- Scaffolding4
- Useful IoC4
- Concurrent4
- Entity framework4
- Support and SImplicity4
- Blazor3
- Nuget package manager3
- F♯2
Pros of Sails.js
- Data-driven apis49
- Waterline ORM47
- Mvc37
- Easy rest32
- Real-time25
- Open source21
- Service-oriented architecture19
- Scalable18
- Convension over configuration10
- Rails-like asset pipeline9
- Node machines and machinepacks9
- Easy route/controller generation7
- Ruby on Rails basic stuff for JS devs6
- CLI for scaffolding project pieces3
- WebSocket support3
- Supportive community1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of .NET
- C#13
- Too expensive to deploy and maintain12
- Microsoft dependable systems8
- Microsoft itself8
- Hard learning curve5
- Tight integration with visual studio3
- Not have a full fledged visual studio for linux3
- Microsoft itself 🤡🥲1
Cons of Sails.js
- Waterline ORM5
- Defaults to VueJS4
- Standard MVC0