.NET vs Spring Framework

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.3K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Spring Framework

Stacks6.5K

Followers886

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

.NET vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Programming Language: .NET framework primarily uses C# as its programming language, whereas the Spring Framework is based on Java. This difference in programming languages leads to various syntax disparities and coding styles between the two frameworks.
Platform Dependency: .NET is a Microsoft framework, making it more suitable for Windows-based applications, whereas the Spring Framework is platform-independent, allowing it to run on any platform that supports Java. This platform dependency can influence the choice of framework based on the application's targeted environment.
Architectural Approach: The .NET framework follows a more opinionated approach to architecture, providing a set of guidelines and structures for developers. In contrast, the Spring Framework offers a more flexible and lightweight approach, allowing developers more freedom in designing their application structure.
Community Support: The Spring Framework has a robust open-source community with extensive documentation, forums, and resources available for developers. On the other hand, the .NET community is driven by Microsoft and tends to have more structured support channels and resources provided by the company.
Tooling and Ecosystem: .NET comes with a comprehensive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) in the form of Visual Studio, offering a wide range of tools and features. The Spring Framework, on the other hand, is more lightweight in terms of tooling and relies on third-party plugins and IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA or Eclipse for development.
Runtime Environment: .NET applications generally run on the Common Language Runtime (CLR), which manages memory, security, and other runtime services. In contrast, the Spring Framework relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for its runtime environment, providing features like garbage collection and portability across different platforms.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET and Spring Framework lie in programming language, platform dependency, architectural approach, community support, tooling and ecosystem, and runtime environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, Spring Framework

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

Login
Register
Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
Account Preferences.
Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	Spring Framework
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	It provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform. The framework's core features can be used by any Java application, but there are extensions for building web applications on top of the Java EE platform.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	Lightweight; Dependency Injection; Transaction Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars 59.1K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 38.8K
Stacks 15.3K	Stacks 6.5K
Followers 5.9K	Followers 886
Votes 1.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft dependable systems 8 Microsoft itself 5 Hard learning curve	No community feedback yet
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	AngularJS MySQL NetBeans IDE Hibernate IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to .NET, Spring Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

.NET vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Programming Language: .NET framework primarily uses C# as its programming language, whereas the Spring Framework is based on Java. This difference in programming languages leads to various syntax disparities and coding styles between the two frameworks.
Platform Dependency: .NET is a Microsoft framework, making it more suitable for Windows-based applications, whereas the Spring Framework is platform-independent, allowing it to run on any platform that supports Java. This platform dependency can influence the choice of framework based on the application's targeted environment.
Architectural Approach: The .NET framework follows a more opinionated approach to architecture, providing a set of guidelines and structures for developers. In contrast, the Spring Framework offers a more flexible and lightweight approach, allowing developers more freedom in designing their application structure.
Community Support: The Spring Framework has a robust open-source community with extensive documentation, forums, and resources available for developers. On the other hand, the .NET community is driven by Microsoft and tends to have more structured support channels and resources provided by the company.
Tooling and Ecosystem: .NET comes with a comprehensive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) in the form of Visual Studio, offering a wide range of tools and features. The Spring Framework, on the other hand, is more lightweight in terms of tooling and relies on third-party plugins and IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA or Eclipse for development.
Runtime Environment: .NET applications generally run on the Common Language Runtime (CLR), which manages memory, security, and other runtime services. In contrast, the Spring Framework relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for its runtime environment, providing features like garbage collection and portability across different platforms.

.NET vs Spring Framework

Overview