.NET vs Spring MVC

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.3K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Spring MVC

Stacks479

Followers518

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

.NET vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, choosing between .NET and Spring MVC can be a critical decision. Both frameworks have their own set of strengths and differences. Below are key differences that can help developers in making an informed decision.

Architecture: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft that follows the Microsoft architecture pattern, emphasizing modularity, maintainability, and scalability. On the other hand, Spring MVC is part of the larger Spring framework which follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern, offering flexibility and modularity in designing web applications.
Platform Independence: .NET primarily targets the Windows platform, making it a preferred choice for organizations using Microsoft technologies. In contrast, Spring MVC is platform-independent, allowing developers to deploy applications on various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Programming Language Support: .NET primarily supports C# and VB.NET, providing a strong type system and performance optimization. Spring MVC, on the other hand, supports a wider range of programming languages, including Java and Kotlin, catering to developers with different language preferences.
Community and Ecosystem: .NET has a strong backing from Microsoft, providing extensive documentation, support, and tools to developers. Spring MVC, being an open-source framework, has a vast community contributing plugins, extensions, and resources, fostering innovation and collaboration among developers.
Configuration and Setup: .NET development often requires using Visual Studio IDE and the .NET framework, simplifying project setup but limiting flexibility. Spring MVC allows developers to choose their preferred IDE and configuration settings, offering more customization options and control over the project setup process.
REST API Development: Spring MVC excels in building RESTful APIs with its robust support for HTTP methods, content negotiation, and request mapping features. While .NET also supports REST API development, Spring MVC's focus on REST principles and conventions makes it a preferred choice for API-centric applications.

In Summary, understanding the architectural differences, language support, platform independence, community backing, configuration flexibility, and focus on REST API development can help developers choose between .NET and Spring MVC based on their project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, Spring MVC

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	Spring MVC
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars 59.1K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 38.8K
Stacks 15.3K	Stacks 479
Followers 5.9K	Followers 518
Votes 1.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft dependable systems 8 Microsoft itself 5 Hard learning curve	No community feedback yet
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	AngularJS Bootstrap Spring Boot Hibernate

What are some alternatives to .NET, Spring MVC?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

.NET vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Architecture: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft that follows the Microsoft architecture pattern, emphasizing modularity, maintainability, and scalability. On the other hand, Spring MVC is part of the larger Spring framework which follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern, offering flexibility and modularity in designing web applications.
Platform Independence: .NET primarily targets the Windows platform, making it a preferred choice for organizations using Microsoft technologies. In contrast, Spring MVC is platform-independent, allowing developers to deploy applications on various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Programming Language Support: .NET primarily supports C# and VB.NET, providing a strong type system and performance optimization. Spring MVC, on the other hand, supports a wider range of programming languages, including Java and Kotlin, catering to developers with different language preferences.
Community and Ecosystem: .NET has a strong backing from Microsoft, providing extensive documentation, support, and tools to developers. Spring MVC, being an open-source framework, has a vast community contributing plugins, extensions, and resources, fostering innovation and collaboration among developers.
Configuration and Setup: .NET development often requires using Visual Studio IDE and the .NET framework, simplifying project setup but limiting flexibility. Spring MVC allows developers to choose their preferred IDE and configuration settings, offering more customization options and control over the project setup process.
REST API Development: Spring MVC excels in building RESTful APIs with its robust support for HTTP methods, content negotiation, and request mapping features. While .NET also supports REST API development, Spring MVC's focus on REST principles and conventions makes it a preferred choice for API-centric applications.

.NET vs Spring MVC

Overview