StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs ZK

.NET vs ZK

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.3K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
ZK
ZK
Stacks35
Followers48
Votes6

.NET vs ZK: What are the differences?

  1. Language Compatibility: .NET primarily supports languages like C#, Visual Basic, and F#, while ZK supports Java and Kotlin, making language compatibility a key difference between the two frameworks.
  2. User Interface Development: ZK focuses heavily on server-centric architecture, where the UI components are managed on the server-side, while .NET offers a more flexible approach with server-side and client-side development options.
  3. Community and Ecosystem: .NET has a larger community and ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, tools, and resources available for developers compared to ZK, which may have a more limited community and support network.
  4. License and Cost: .NET is primarily open-source with a free version available for development, whereas ZK operates on a freemium model, offering both open-source and commercial editions with additional features.
  5. Platform Independence: ZK is designed to be platform-independent, allowing applications to run on different systems without modification, while .NET applications are typically more tied to the Windows platform, although efforts like .NET Core have increased cross-platform compatibility.
  6. Component Library: ZK provides a rich set of pre-built user interface components to simplify development, while .NET requires developers to rely on third-party libraries or custom solutions for building complex UI components.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET and ZK lie in language compatibility, user interface development approach, community support, licensing, platform independence, and the availability of pre-built UI components.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, ZK

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
ZK
ZK

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

It is renowned for "Ajax without JavaScript", enabling developers to build rich Web applications without any knowledge of Ajax and JavaScript. It is used for building enterprise web and mobile apps.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
jQuery, Spring, JPA, Hibernate, JavaEE, Grails, Scala
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
35
Followers
5.9K
Followers
48
Votes
1.9K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Compatibility
  • 1
    Components
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Performance
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
Scala
Scala
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring Security
Spring Security
jQuery
jQuery
Grails
Grails
Java EE
Java EE

What are some alternatives to .NET, ZK?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase