DraftJS vs Escher: What are the differences?

## Introduction
DraftJS and Escher are both widely used frameworks for building rich text editors. However, there are key differences between the two that developers should consider.

1. **Architecture**: DraftJS is a rich text editor framework developed by Facebook, whereas Escher is a collaborative text editing library developed by Convergence Labs. This distinction in architecture can lead to differences in performance, scalability, and ease of integration with other tools and platforms.
   
2. **Features**: DraftJS offers a wide range of features for building complex text editors with support for rich formatting, inline styles, block styles, and block components. On the other hand, Escher focuses more on collaborative editing features such as real-time synchronization, conflict resolution, and presence awareness. Depending on the requirements of the project, developers need to choose between extensive text editing capabilities or collaborative features.

3. **Customization**: DraftJS provides a high level of customization through its plugin architecture, allowing developers to extend and modify the editor's behavior to suit their needs. In contrast, Escher offers less customization options out of the box, but provides a solid foundation for building collaborative editing applications without the need for extensive customization.

4. **Community Support**: DraftJS has a larger and more active community of developers, which means more resources, plugins, and tutorials are available for developers looking to work with the framework. Escher, being a relatively newer framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and development support.

5. **Pricing**: DraftJS is an open-source framework, meaning it is free to use and modify for both personal and commercial projects. Escher, on the other hand, may have licensing fees or usage restrictions depending on the edition and usage scenario, which could be a factor to consider for budget-constrained projects.

6. **Ease of Use**: DraftJS is generally considered more user-friendly and easier to get started with due to its extensive documentation, tutorials, and examples. Escher, being more specialized towards collaborative editing, may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with real-time synchronization and conflict resolution techniques.

In Summary, DraftJS and Escher differ in their architecture, features, customization options, community support, pricing, and ease of use, making them suitable for different types of rich text editing applications.