StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Draggable JS vs jQuery

Draggable JS vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
Draggable JS
Draggable JS
Stacks53
Followers72
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.4K
Forks1.1K

Draggable JS vs jQuery: What are the differences?

1. **Draggable JS vs. jQuery Selector**: Draggable JS provides a customizable and flexible way to define draggable elements by applying specific classes, whereas jQuery utilizes CSS-like selectors to target elements for drag and drop functionality. 2. **Draggable JS Event Handling**: Draggable JS offers a rich set of events for handling various drag and drop interactions, enabling developers to create dynamic behaviors based on user actions. In contrast, jQuery has a simpler event model for drag and drop, making it easier for beginners. 3. **Draggable JS API Usage**: Draggable JS exposes a comprehensive API that allows developers to have fine-grained control over draggable elements, including constraints, snapping, and grid settings. jQuery, on the other hand, provides a higher-level abstraction for drag and drop operations, leading to quicker implementation but limited customization options. 4. **Draggable JS Performance**: Draggable JS is optimized for performance, especially when dealing with a large number of draggable elements on a page, by utilizing efficient algorithms and minimizing DOM manipulation. jQuery may suffer from performance issues in scenarios with complex drag and drop interactions due to its general-purpose design. 5. **Draggable JS Dependencies**: Draggable JS is a standalone library that does not rely on external dependencies, allowing for easy integration into projects without additional overhead or conflicts. jQuery, being a larger library with a wider scope of functionalities, may introduce unnecessary overhead when only drag and drop functionality is needed. 6. **Draggable JS Community Support**: Draggable JS has a dedicated community that actively maintains and updates the library, providing prompt support and continuous development. In contrast, the jQuery community has diversified its focus to various aspects of web development, resulting in potentially slower updates and fewer resources dedicated to drag and drop features.

In Summary, Draggable JS offers a robust and efficient solution for implementing drag and drop functionality with extensive customization options and performance optimizations, while jQuery provides a simpler and more general-purpose approach with quicker implementation but limited flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, Draggable JS

Peter
Peter

Senior Software Engineer

Sep 20, 2020

Decided

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

72.5k views72.5k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments
kazi
kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
Draggable JS
Draggable JS

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Draggable is a modular drag & drop library, allowing you to start small and build up with the features you need. At its most basic, Draggable gives you drag & drop functionality, fast DOM reordering, accessible markup, and a bundle of events to grab on to.

-
Works with native drag, mouse, touch and force touch events;Can extend dragging behaviour by hooking into draggables event life cycle;Can extend drag detection by adding sensors to draggable;The library is targeted ES6 first
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
18.4K
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
53
Followers
70.6K
Followers
72
Votes
6.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
ES6
ES6

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Draggable JS?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase