StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Draggable JS vs Lucia

Draggable JS vs Lucia

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Draggable JS
Draggable JS
Stacks53
Followers72
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.4K
Forks1.1K
Lucia
Lucia
Stacks8
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars748
Forks28

Draggable JS vs Lucia: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to interactive web elements, Draggable JS and Lucia are both popular choices. While both libraries provide functionality for creating draggable elements on a webpage, they differ in their approach and capabilities. Below are key differences between Draggable JS and Lucia.

  1. Implementation Method: Draggable JS is a standalone library that focuses solely on enabling drag-and-drop functionality on HTML elements. On the other hand, Lucia is a framework that offers a broader range of features beyond just drag-and-drop, such as reactive data binding and DOM manipulation.

  2. Size and Performance: Draggable JS is lightweight and designed specifically for drag-and-drop interactions, making it more performant in that particular task. Lucia, being a full-fledged framework, might have a larger file size due to the additional features it provides, potentially impacting performance.

  3. API Complexity: Draggable JS has a simple and straightforward API, making it easy to integrate into existing projects. In contrast, Lucia's API may be more complex, especially for beginners, as it involves learning the framework's conventions and patterns.

  4. Customization Options: Draggable JS offers a high level of customization for the drag-and-drop behavior, allowing developers to fine-tune various aspects of the interaction. Lucia, while versatile, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to a library specifically dedicated to drag-and-drop functionality.

  5. Community and Support: Draggable JS may have a larger community of users and contributors, leading to more resources and support available online. Lucia, being a newer or lesser-known framework, might have a smaller community, potentially resulting in fewer resources and support options.

  6. Dependency Management: Draggable JS may have fewer dependencies or be more modular in nature, making it easier to manage in projects with specific requirements. Lucia, as a framework, may come with a set of dependencies that need to be accounted for when considering integration into a project.

In Summary, Draggable JS and Lucia differ in their implementation method, size and performance, API complexity, customization options, community and support, and dependency management, making them suited for different use cases based on individual project needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Draggable JS
Draggable JS
Lucia
Lucia

Draggable is a modular drag & drop library, allowing you to start small and build up with the features you need. At its most basic, Draggable gives you drag & drop functionality, fast DOM reordering, accessible markup, and a bundle of events to grab on to.

It is a tiny JavaScript (UMD compatible) library that serves as a bridge between vanilla JavaScript and Vue. It provides a declarative API similar to Vue/Alpine to create views, making development predictable and intuitive through markup-centric code.

Works with native drag, mouse, touch and force touch events;Can extend dragging behaviour by hooking into draggables event life cycle;Can extend drag detection by adding sensors to draggable;The library is targeted ES6 first
Declarative; Reactive; Lightweight
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.4K
GitHub Stars
748
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
28
Stacks
53
Stacks
8
Followers
72
Followers
7
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
ES6
ES6
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Draggable JS, Lucia?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase