StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Dropzone.js vs Vanilla.JS

Dropzone.js vs Vanilla.JS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Dropzone.js
Dropzone.js
Stacks68
Followers20
Votes0
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Stacks82
Followers85
Votes9

Dropzone.js vs Vanilla.JS: What are the differences?

  1. Overall Functionality: Dropzone.js is a library specifically designed for file uploading with drag and drop capabilities, while Vanilla.JS is a general-purpose JavaScript library to manipulate the DOM and interact with HTML elements. Dropzone.js simplifies the process of uploading files by providing a pre-built UI, whereas Vanilla.JS requires manual implementation of file upload functionality.
  2. Dependencies: Dropzone.js has dependencies on external libraries like jQuery, but Vanilla.JS does not have any external dependencies as it is a standalone library. This makes Vanilla.JS more lightweight and easier to integrate into projects without worrying about additional dependencies.
  3. Customization: Dropzone.js offers a high level of customization through its configuration options and event handling, allowing developers to tailor the file upload experience to their specific needs. On the other hand, Vanilla.JS requires developers to write more custom code to achieve the desired functionality and user experience.
  4. Browser Support: Dropzone.js is compatible with a wide range of browsers, including older versions, thanks to its robust feature set and fallback mechanisms. Vanilla.JS also boasts good browser compatibility but may require more manual adjustments for older browsers that lack modern JavaScript support.
  5. Community Support: Dropzone.js has a dedicated community of users and developers who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums and documentation. Vanilla.JS, being a core JavaScript library, benefits from the larger JavaScript community for support and updates, but may not have as focused of a user base as Dropzone.js.
  6. Learning Curve: Dropzone.js is relatively easy to learn and implement for file uploading tasks due to its intuitive design and documentation, while Vanilla.JS may have a steeper learning curve for beginners as it requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript and DOM manipulation concepts.

In Summary, Dropzone.js is a specialized library for file uploading with drag and drop functionality, while Vanilla.JS is a general-purpose JavaScript library for DOM manipulation, with differences in functionality, dependencies, customization, browser support, community support, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Dropzone.js
Dropzone.js
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS

A light weight JavaScript library that turns an HTML element. This means that a user can drag and drop a file onto it, and the file gets uploaded to the server via AJAX.

It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.

File uploads;Drag and drop;Image previews
-
Statistics
Stacks
68
Stacks
82
Followers
20
Followers
85
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Web-components
  • 1
    NO CONVENTIONS
  • 1
    Unopinionated
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    You need to build anything yourself
Integrations
WordPress
WordPress
HTML5
HTML5
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Dropzone.js, Vanilla.JS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase