Durandal vs KnockoutJS

Overview

Knockout

Stacks369

Followers202

Votes6

GitHub Stars10.5K

Forks1.5K

Durandal

Stacks31

Followers36

Votes20

GitHub Stars1.7K

Forks371

Durandal vs KnockoutJS: What are the differences?

Durandal and KnockoutJS are both JavaScript libraries that are used for building user interfaces in web applications. However, there are several key differences between the two:

Architecture: Durandal is a complete framework that follows the MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) architectural pattern, which provides a structure for organizing code and separating concerns. On the other hand, KnockoutJS is a lightweight library that mainly focuses on providing data-binding capabilities between the UI and underlying data model.
Routing: Durandal has built-in support for client-side routing, which allows for easy and seamless navigation between different views in the application. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, does not provide native routing capabilities. Developers typically rely on additional libraries or frameworks to handle routing when using KnockoutJS.
Composition: Durandal emphasizes the concept of composition, where views and view models can be dynamically composed and managed. It provides a powerful system for managing modularization and reusability of components within an application. In contrast, KnockoutJS doesn't have built-in support for composition. Components are typically manually instantiated and managed by the developer.
Validation: Durandal includes validation functionality out of the box, making it easier to implement and enforce validation rules on input fields and models. KnockoutJS does not provide built-in validation capabilities, requiring developers to rely on additional libraries or custom code to implement validation.
Lifecycle and Events: Durandal provides a comprehensive lifecycle management system, allowing developers to easily hook into various stages of the application's lifecycle, such as activation and deactivation. It also has an event system that enables communication between different components. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, doesn't have a built-in lifecycle management system or native support for event handling.
Extensibility: Durandal offers a wide range of extensibility options, allowing developers to customize and extend various aspects of the framework. It has a plugin architecture that facilitates the integration of additional functionality. KnockoutJS also supports extensibility through custom bindings, which allow developers to create their own reusable bindings, but it lacks the same level of flexibility and extensibility options provided by Durandal.

In summary, Durandal is a more comprehensive framework that provides a complete solution for building web applications with rich user interfaces. It offers features such as routing, composition, validation, lifecycle management, and extensibility out of the box. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, is a lightweight library focused on data-binding capabilities and requires additional tools or frameworks for features like routing and composition.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Knockout	Durandal
It is a JavaScript library that helps you to create rich, responsive display and editor user interfaces with a clean underlying data model. Any time you have sections of UI that update dynamically (e.g., changing depending on the user’s actions or when an external data source changes), it can help you implement it more simply and maintainably.	Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.
Easily associate DOM elements with model data using a concise, readable syntax; When your data model's state changes, your UI updates automatically; Implicitly set up chains of relationships between model data, to transform and combine it; Quickly generate sophisticated, nested UIs as a function of your model data	JS & HTML modularity; Simple app lifecycle; Eventing, modals, message boxes, etc; Navigation & screen state management;Consistent async programming w/ promises; App bundling and optimization; Use any backend technology; Built on top of jQuery, Knockout & requireJS; Integrates with popular CSS libraries such as Bootstrap and Foundation; Make your own templatable and data-bindable widgets; Fully testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.5K	GitHub Stars 1.7K
GitHub Forks 1.5K	GitHub Forks 371
Stacks 369	Stacks 31
Followers 202	Followers 36
Votes 6	Votes 20
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Data centered application 2 Great for validations 1 Open source	Pros 3 UI components 3 Easy to learn 2 Free 2 Customizable 2 Easy to start
Integrations
JavaScript	Bootstrap Foundation

What are some alternatives to Knockout, Durandal?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Related Comparisons

Durandal vs KnockoutJS: What are the differences?

Durandal and KnockoutJS are both JavaScript libraries that are used for building user interfaces in web applications. However, there are several key differences between the two:

Architecture: Durandal is a complete framework that follows the MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) architectural pattern, which provides a structure for organizing code and separating concerns. On the other hand, KnockoutJS is a lightweight library that mainly focuses on providing data-binding capabilities between the UI and underlying data model.
Routing: Durandal has built-in support for client-side routing, which allows for easy and seamless navigation between different views in the application. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, does not provide native routing capabilities. Developers typically rely on additional libraries or frameworks to handle routing when using KnockoutJS.
Composition: Durandal emphasizes the concept of composition, where views and view models can be dynamically composed and managed. It provides a powerful system for managing modularization and reusability of components within an application. In contrast, KnockoutJS doesn't have built-in support for composition. Components are typically manually instantiated and managed by the developer.
Validation: Durandal includes validation functionality out of the box, making it easier to implement and enforce validation rules on input fields and models. KnockoutJS does not provide built-in validation capabilities, requiring developers to rely on additional libraries or custom code to implement validation.
Lifecycle and Events: Durandal provides a comprehensive lifecycle management system, allowing developers to easily hook into various stages of the application's lifecycle, such as activation and deactivation. It also has an event system that enables communication between different components. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, doesn't have a built-in lifecycle management system or native support for event handling.
Extensibility: Durandal offers a wide range of extensibility options, allowing developers to customize and extend various aspects of the framework. It has a plugin architecture that facilitates the integration of additional functionality. KnockoutJS also supports extensibility through custom bindings, which allow developers to create their own reusable bindings, but it lacks the same level of flexibility and extensibility options provided by Durandal.

Durandal vs KnockoutJS

Overview