Home
Application and Data
Assets and Media
File Conversion

Ebook Glue vs Tesseract OCR

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ebook Glue
0
4
+ 1
0
Tesseract OCR
62
170
+ 1
2
Add tool

Ebook Glue vs Tesseract OCR: What are the differences?

Developers describe Ebook Glue as "Create .epub and .mobi ebooks for Kindle, Nook, iBooks, and popular readers". Ebook Glue solves a simple frustration: difficulty in publishing content for electronic reading devices. It started off as a small side project, and has evolved into a growing web application that thousands of people rely on to publish their content online. On the other hand, Tesseract OCR is detailed as "Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine". Tesseract was originally developed at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Bristol and at Hewlett-Packard Co, Greeley Colorado between 1985 and 1994, with some more changes made in 1996 to port to Windows, and some C++izing in 1998. In 2005 Tesseract was open sourced by HP. Since 2006 it is developed by Google.

Ebook Glue can be classified as a tool in the "File Conversion" category, while Tesseract OCR is grouped under "Image Analysis API".

Tesseract OCR is an open source tool with 27.8K GitHub stars and 5.31K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Tesseract OCR's open source repository on GitHub.

Decisions about Ebook Glue and Tesseract OCR
Vladyslav Holubiev
Software Enginieer at Shelf · | 1 upvote · 15.7K views
Chose
Tesseract OCRTesseract OCR
over
Amazon RekognitionAmazon Rekognition
at
()

AWS Rekognition has an OCR feature but can recognize only up to 50 words per image, which is a deal-breaker for us. (see my tweet).

Also, we discovered fantastic speed and quality improvements in the 4.x versions of Tesseract. Meanwhile, the quality of AWS Rekognition's OCR remains to be mediocre in comparison.

Worth mentioning that we run Tesseract in AWS Lambda via aws-lambda-tesseract library.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Ebook Glue
Pros of Tesseract OCR
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 1
      Very lightweight library
    • 1
      Building training set is easy

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Ebook Glue
    Cons of Tesseract OCR
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 1
        Works best with white background and black text

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Ebook Glue?

      Ebook Glue solves a simple frustration: difficulty in publishing content for electronic reading devices. It started off as a small side project, and has evolved into a growing web application that thousands of people rely on to publish their content online.

      What is Tesseract OCR?

      Tesseract was originally developed at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Bristol and at Hewlett-Packard Co, Greeley Colorado between 1985 and 1994, with some more changes made in 1996 to port to Windows, and some C++izing in 1998. In 2005 Tesseract was open sourced by HP. Since 2006 it is developed by Google.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Ebook Glue?
      What companies use Tesseract OCR?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using Ebook Glue or Tesseract OCR.
        Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Ebook Glue?
        What tools integrate with Tesseract OCR?
          No integrations found
          What are some alternatives to Ebook Glue and Tesseract OCR?
          wkhtmltopdf
          wkhtmltopdf and wkhtmltoimage are command line tools to render HTML into PDF and various image formats using the QT Webkit rendering engine. These run entirely "headless" and do not require a display or display service.
          Pandoc
          It is a free and open-source document converter, widely used as a writing tool and as a basis for publishing workflows. It converts files from one markup format into another. It can convert documents in (several dialects of) Markdown, reStructuredText, textile, HTML, DocBook, LaTeX, MediaWiki markup, TWiki and many more.
          CloudConvert
          Convert anything to anything - more than 200 different audio, video, document, ebook, archive, image, spreadsheet and presentation formats supported.
          DocRaptor
          DocRaptor makes it easy to convert HTML to PDF and XLS format. Choose your document format, select configuration options and make an HTTP POST request to our server. DocRaptor returns your file in a matter of seconds. We provide extensive documentation and examples to get you started, and our API makes it easy to use DocRaptor to generate PDF and Excel files in your own web applications.
          Docparser
          Docparser is a cloud based document processing solution and workflow automation software. Docparser makes it easy to convert PDF documents into structured data and automate document based workflows.
          See all alternatives
          Interest over time

          Related Comparisons

          Google Cloud Vision API vs Tesseract OCRGoogle Cloud Vision API vs Tesseract OCR vs scanRTesseract OCR vs Tesseract.jsAmazon Rekognition vs Tesseract OCRAmazon Rekognition vs Google Cloud Vision API vs Tesseract OCR

          Trending Comparisons

          Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

          Top Comparisons

          Postman vs Swagger UIBootstrap vs MaterializeBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabHipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack