Echo vs Falcon: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Routing and Request Handling: Echo uses a routing group concept, which allows grouping routes with the same middleware. On the other hand, Falcon utilizes a router instance to handle requests and their associated middleware. This distinguishes how routes are organized and processed within the framework.
2. Error Handling: Echo includes built-in error handling mechanisms with middleware to handle HTTP errors. In contrast, Falcon requires developers to implement error handling explicitly in their code, providing more control over the error response behavior.
3. Middleware Support: Echo offers a robust middleware system that simplifies adding global logic to requests and responses. Falcon, on the other hand, provides middleware-like hooks called hooks that allow developers to inject logic at specific points in the request-response cycle, providing more flexibility but with additional complexity.
4. Performance: Falcon is known for its lightweight design and high-performance capabilities, making it suitable for building fast and efficient APIs. On the contrary, while Echo is fast and efficient, it may not match Falcon's performance benchmarks in certain scenarios due to its broader feature set.
5. Templating: Echo provides integration with various template engines such as HTML templates, making it suitable for web application development. Falcon, as a framework focused on APIs, does not include built-in support for HTML templates, emphasizing its role in API development rather than web applications.
6. Conventions vs. Flexibility: Echo follows the "convention over configuration" paradigm, providing default settings to streamline development. Falcon prioritizes flexibility and customization, allowing developers to have more control over every aspect of their application, leading to more verbose configurations.

In Summary, Echo and Falcon differ in routing and request handling, error handling, middleware support, performance, templating, and the balance between conventions and flexibility in development.