Effector vs Zustand

Overview

Effector

Stacks32

Followers26

Votes23

Zustand

Stacks371

Followers157

Votes34

Effector vs Zustand: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Effector and Zustand

Effector and Zustand are two popular state management libraries in the React ecosystem. While both libraries aim to simplify state management in React applications, there are several key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: One key difference between Effector and Zustand is their approach to state management architecture. Effector follows a reactive programming model and provides abstractions like stores, events, and effects to manage state and side-effects. On the other hand, Zustand is based on the React hooks API and follows a more simplistic and lightweight approach to state management.
Integration: Effector is designed to be framework-agnostic and can be used with any UI framework, including React. It provides bindings for React to easily integrate with its reactive state management. Zustand, on the other hand, is specifically built for React and leverages the power of React hooks to manage state within components.
Concurrency: Effector has built-in support for managing concurrent state updates and provides tools like domains and stores to handle complex asynchronous logic. Zustand, on the other hand, doesn't have native support for concurrency management. However, it can be easily integrated with other libraries or patterns to handle asynchronous operations.
Developer Experience: Effector provides a rich set of developer tools, including a time-travel debugger, to aid in debugging and optimizing state management in complex applications. It also has a powerful type inference system that ensures type safety throughout the application. Zustand focuses on simplicity and provides a minimalistic API that is easy to understand and use, resulting in a more lightweight developer experience.
Usage Scenarios: Effector is well-suited for large-scale applications with complex state management requirements. It provides advanced features like root stores, derived stores, and event normalization, which make it more suitable for handling complex application logic. Zustand, on the other hand, is perfect for small to medium-sized projects or simple use cases where a lightweight and straightforward state management solution is desired.
Community and Adoption: Effector has gained popularity in the React community and has a growing ecosystem with active community support. It has been used in production by large companies and has a strong presence in open-source projects. Zustand, while relatively newer compared to Effector, has also gained traction and has a growing community, but its adoption is not as widespread as Effector.

In summary, Effector and Zustand differ in terms of architecture, integration, concurrency management, developer experience, usage scenarios, and community adoption. Understanding these key differences can help developers choose the right state management library based on their project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Effector	Zustand
It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.	Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.
Type safe; Framework agnostic; Developer-friendly; Maximum performance; Tiny bundle size; Plain javascript	Simpler and un-opinionated; Makes hooks the primary means of consuming state; Doesn't wrap your app into context providers; Can inform components transiently (without causing render)
Statistics
Stacks 32	Stacks 371
Followers 26	Followers 157
Votes 23	Votes 34
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Statically typed 7 Less boilerplate 4 Small bundle size 2 Signal functions 2 Effects calculation Cons 2 Undocumented methods like setState 1 Lack of debugging tools	Pros 10 Simple API 7 Unopinionated 5 Asynchronous action out the box 4 Supports Redux DevTools 3 Open source Cons 2 Requires function component
Integrations
TypeScript JavaScript Flow (JS)	React

What are some alternatives to Effector, Zustand?

Redux

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

redux-saga

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

vuex

Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.

redux-thunk

Redux Thunk middleware allows you to write action creators that return a function instead of an action. The thunk can be used to delay the dispatch of an action, or to dispatch only if a certain condition is met. The inner function receives the store methods dispatch and getState as parameters.

Statsbot

Statsbot is helping you take control of your raw data, providing an all-in-one analysis tool for engineers and non-tech folks alike.

Unstated

State so simple, it goes without saying

digna

Is the game-changing European modern data quality platform that effortlessly uncovers anomalies and errors in your data with Artificial Intelligence.

reselect

Simple “selector” library for Redux (and others) inspired by getters in NuclearJS, subscriptions in re-frame and this proposal from speedskater.

Redux Observable

It allows developers to dispatch a function that returns an observable, promise or iterable of action(s). Compose and cancel async actions to create side effects and more.

Related Comparisons

Effector vs Zustand: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Effector and Zustand

Architecture: One key difference between Effector and Zustand is their approach to state management architecture. Effector follows a reactive programming model and provides abstractions like stores, events, and effects to manage state and side-effects. On the other hand, Zustand is based on the React hooks API and follows a more simplistic and lightweight approach to state management.
Integration: Effector is designed to be framework-agnostic and can be used with any UI framework, including React. It provides bindings for React to easily integrate with its reactive state management. Zustand, on the other hand, is specifically built for React and leverages the power of React hooks to manage state within components.
Concurrency: Effector has built-in support for managing concurrent state updates and provides tools like domains and stores to handle complex asynchronous logic. Zustand, on the other hand, doesn't have native support for concurrency management. However, it can be easily integrated with other libraries or patterns to handle asynchronous operations.
Developer Experience: Effector provides a rich set of developer tools, including a time-travel debugger, to aid in debugging and optimizing state management in complex applications. It also has a powerful type inference system that ensures type safety throughout the application. Zustand focuses on simplicity and provides a minimalistic API that is easy to understand and use, resulting in a more lightweight developer experience.
Usage Scenarios: Effector is well-suited for large-scale applications with complex state management requirements. It provides advanced features like root stores, derived stores, and event normalization, which make it more suitable for handling complex application logic. Zustand, on the other hand, is perfect for small to medium-sized projects or simple use cases where a lightweight and straightforward state management solution is desired.
Community and Adoption: Effector has gained popularity in the React community and has a growing ecosystem with active community support. It has been used in production by large companies and has a strong presence in open-source projects. Zustand, while relatively newer compared to Effector, has also gained traction and has a growing community, but its adoption is not as widespread as Effector.

Effector vs Zustand

Overview

Effector vs Zustand: What are the differences?