StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. EJS vs Eta JS

EJS vs Eta JS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

EJS
EJS
Stacks522
Followers359
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks859
Eta JS
Eta JS
Stacks4
Followers6
Votes0

EJS vs Eta JS: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, choosing the right templating engine is crucial. Two popular options are EJS (Embedded JavaScript) and Eta JS. Understanding the key differences between EJS and Eta JS can help developers make informed decisions when selecting a templating engine for their projects.

  1. Configuration and API Usage: EJS requires minimal setup and has a straightforward API for template rendering, making it easy for developers to quickly integrate into their projects. On the other hand, Eta JS offers more advanced configuration options and a powerful API with features like block helpers and decorators, providing a higher level of customization.

  2. Performance and Speed: EJS is known for its simplicity and speed, making it a reliable choice for smaller projects or when performance is a priority. In contrast, Eta JS is designed for efficiency and performance optimization, utilizing features like asynchronous rendering and caching to deliver faster rendering speeds for complex applications.

  3. Syntax and Features: EJS uses familiar JavaScript syntax with embedded template markup, offering a seamless transition for developers familiar with JavaScript. Eta JS introduces a more expressive syntax with additional features like autoescaping, partials, and layouts, providing a more robust toolset for creating dynamic templates with reusable components.

  4. Error Handling and Debugging: EJS provides basic error handling and debugging capabilities, making it easier to identify issues in templates during development. Eta JS enhances error reporting with detailed stack traces and error messages, aiding in the troubleshooting process and improving the development experience for developers.

  5. Community and Support: EJS has a large user base and active community support, ensuring ongoing maintenance and updates for the templating engine. Eta JS, while newer, is gaining traction in the developer community and is backed by comprehensive documentation and responsive support channels, offering assistance to developers adopting the framework.

  6. Extensibility and Plugins: EJS allows for simple customization through filters and plugins, enabling developers to extend its functionality as needed. Eta JS offers a modular architecture with built-in support for plugins and extensions, allowing developers to integrate additional features seamlessly into their projects for enhanced flexibility and scalability.

Summary: In Summary, EJS and Eta JS differ in configuration, performance, syntax, error handling, community support, and extensibility, providing developers with distinct options for templating engines based on their project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

EJS
EJS
Eta JS
Eta JS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Fast, lightweight, pluggable embedded JS template engine. Supports async templates, partials, and fixes many of the parsing issues with doT and EJS. Faster than most template engines, including EJS, doT, Handlebars, Pug, and Nunjucks.

Template caching and partials;Intelligent error handling with line numbers
Whitespace control; Plugins; Custom delimiters; Partials; Comments; Delimiters in strings; Fast; Async
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
859
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
522
Stacks
4
Followers
359
Followers
6
Votes
18
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    For a beginner it's just plain javascript code
  • 6
    It'a easy to understand the concept behind it
  • 3
    Quick for templating UI project
  • 3
    You almost know how to use it from start
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to EJS, Eta JS?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase