StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. EJS vs React

EJS vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
EJS
EJS
Stacks522
Followers359
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks859

EJS vs React: What are the differences?

Both EJS and React are popular JavaScript frameworks used for web development. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Templating vs. Component-based: EJS is a templating engine that allows you to embed JavaScript code within HTML templates, whereas React is a component-based framework that builds reusable UI components. EJS focuses on generating HTML on the server-side, while React excels in creating dynamic and interactive user interfaces on the client-side.

  2. Rendering: When using EJS, the templates are rendered on the server-side and the resulting HTML is sent to the client's browser. This means that the browser receives fully rendered HTML files from the server. In contrast, React updates and renders components on the client-side, allowing for more efficient rendering and the ability to build single-page applications.

  3. Virtual DOM: React utilizes a virtual DOM, a lightweight representation of the actual DOM, to optimize the rendering process. When there are changes in the state or props of a React component, only the affected parts of the virtual DOM are updated and then efficiently reconciled with the actual DOM. This leads to a faster and more efficient rendering compared to traditional template engines like EJS.

  4. Data Binding: EJS supports two-way data binding, which means that changes made to the model or view are automatically reflected in each other. React, however, uses a unidirectional data flow where data is passed from parent components to child components through props. In React, changes made to the child component's state do not automatically propagate to the parent component, ensuring a more controlled and predictable data flow.

  5. Performance: React is known for its excellent performance due to its virtual DOM and efficient re-rendering strategy. With React, you can render only the necessary components and achieve a higher level of performance, especially when dealing with large and complex applications. EJS, on the other hand, may face performance issues when dealing with extensive server-side rendering and frequent page reloads.

  6. Learning Curve: EJS has a relatively low learning curve, as it follows a more traditional templating approach similar to HTML and JavaScript. Developers familiar with HTML and JavaScript can easily start using EJS. React, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its component-based architecture and the additional tools and concepts it introduces, such as JSX and the virtual DOM.

In summary, EJS is a server-side templating engine that focuses on generating HTML on the server and is suitable for simple web applications. React, on the other hand, is a powerful client-side framework that offers a component-based approach and a faster rendering mechanism through the use of a virtual DOM. React is more suitable for building dynamic and interactive user interfaces, especially in large-scale applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, EJS

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
EJS
EJS

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Template caching and partials;Intelligent error handling with line numbers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
859
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
522
Followers
147.0K
Followers
359
Votes
4.1K
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 6
    It'a easy to understand the concept behind it
  • 6
    For a beginner it's just plain javascript code
  • 3
    Quick for templating UI project
  • 3
    You almost know how to use it from start

What are some alternatives to React, EJS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase