StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Electron Toolkit vs Qt5

Electron Toolkit vs Qt5

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Electron Toolkit
Electron Toolkit
Stacks7
Followers92
Votes0
GitHub Stars806
Forks35
Qt5
Qt5
Stacks91
Followers136
Votes12

Electron Toolkit vs Qt5: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Electron Toolkit and Qt5 for cross-platform desktop application development, there are key differences that developers should consider.

1. Development Language: Electron Toolkit uses web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, while Qt5 uses C++. This difference in programming languages can impact the ease of development, performance, and the overall development ecosystem.

2. Native vs. Web Rendering: Electron Toolkit relies on Chromium for rendering web content, which may affect the performance and memory usage of the application. On the other hand, Qt5 utilizes native rendering, providing a more lightweight and efficient user experience.

3. Compatibility and Dependencies: Electron Toolkit applications typically have larger file sizes due to including the Chromium engine and additional web technologies. Qt5 applications, on the other hand, can be more compact and have fewer dependencies, making distribution and deployment simpler.

4. UI/UX Design: Qt5 provides a more customizable and native look and feel for applications, with extensive support for themes and styles. Electron Toolkit applications may require additional effort to achieve the same level of customization and platform consistency.

5. Performance: Due to the differences in rendering engines and programming languages, Qt5 applications may have better performance optimization compared to Electron Toolkit applications, especially in terms of handling complex UI interactions and heavy computations.

6. Community and Support: Electron Toolkit has a large and active community due to its origins in web development, offering a wealth of resources, plugins, and packages. Qt5 also has a dedicated community, but it may be more challenging to find specific solutions and support for certain development issues.

In Summary, when choosing between Electron Toolkit and Qt5 for cross-platform desktop application development, developers should consider factors such as development language, rendering technology, compatibility, UI/UX design, performance, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Electron Toolkit
Electron Toolkit
Qt5
Qt5

GUI for Electron - package and built your app.

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

GUI for Electron; App icon generator; Screen capturer; Website builder
full development framework ; Internationalization support; embedded toolchains
Statistics
GitHub Stars
806
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
35
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7
Stacks
91
Followers
92
Followers
136
Votes
0
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    Cross platform
  • 2
    C++
Integrations
Electron
Electron
Python
Python
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Electron Toolkit, Qt5?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase