Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elixir vs Perl: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between Elixir and Perl
Elixir and Perl are both popular programming languages, but they have fundamental differences that set them apart. Here are the key differences between Elixir and Perl:
Syntax: Elixir has a modern and clean syntax inspired by Ruby, while Perl uses a more complex and flexible syntax known for its "TIMTOWTDI" (There Is More Than One Way To Do It) approach. Elixir's syntax is easier to read and follow, making it more beginner-friendly and promoting maintainability.
Concurrency and Parallelism: Elixir is built on the Erlang virtual machine, which is designed for concurrency and parallelism. It has built-in support for lightweight processes (called "actors") and a message-passing communication model, making it highly scalable and efficient in handling concurrent tasks. Perl, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for concurrency and parallelism, requiring additional modules or manual implementation.
Functional Programming vs Scripting: Elixir is a functional programming language, meaning it emphasizes immutable data and pure functions, promoting modularity and predictable behavior. Perl, on the other hand, is primarily used as a scripting language, allowing quick and dirty solutions with its rich collection of built-in functions and regular expression support. Elixir's focus on functional programming makes it suitable for complex, reliable, and maintainable systems.
Community and Ecosystem: Perl has a long-standing and active community with a vast ecosystem of libraries and modules available on CPAN (Comprehensive Perl Archive Network). It has been around for decades and has a wealth of resources and solutions for various tasks. Although Elixir's community is relatively smaller, it is rapidly growing and has a passionate developer base. It also has its own package manager (Hex) and a growing ecosystem of libraries focused on scalability and fault tolerance.
Type System: Elixir has a powerful and flexible type system, thanks to its underlying Erlang virtual machine, which supports dynamic typing and pattern matching. It allows for better code expressiveness and robustness, catching errors at compile-time or runtime. Perl, on the other hand, has a more permissive and flexible type system, often relying on implicit conversions and context-dependent behavior.
Error Handling: Elixir promotes a philosophy of "let it crash" and has built-in mechanisms for handling errors, such as supervisors and fault tolerance. It encourages the idea of failing fast and recovering gracefully. Perl, on the other hand, has a more traditional error handling approach with explicit exception handling using
try-catch
blocks and error-checking functions.
In summary, Elixir and Perl differ in terms of syntax, concurrency/parallelism capabilities, programming paradigms, community/ecosystem, type systems, and error handling approaches. These differences impact their suitability for different types of projects and emphasize their unique strengths.
#rust #elixir So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me
We have a lot of experience in JavaScript, writing our services in NodeJS allows developers to transition to the back end without any friction, without having to learn a new language. There is also the option to write services in TypeScript, which adds an expressive type layer. The semi-shared ecosystem between front and back end is nice as well, though specifically NodeJS libraries sometimes suffer in quality, compared to other major languages.
As for why we didn't pick the other languages, most of it comes down to "personal preference" and historically grown code bases, but let's do some post-hoc deduction:
Go is a practical choice, reasonably easy to learn, but until we find performance issues with our NodeJS stack, there is simply no reason to switch. The benefits of using NodeJS so far outweigh those of picking Go. This might change in the future.
PHP is a language we're still using in big parts of our system, and are still sometimes writing new code in. Modern PHP has fixed some of its issues, and probably has the fastest development cycle time, but it suffers around modelling complex asynchronous tasks, and (on a personal note) lack of support for writing in a functional style.
We don't use Python, Elixir or Ruby, mostly because of personal preference and for historic reasons.
Rust, though I personally love and use it in my projects, would require us to specifically hire for that, as the learning curve is quite steep. Its web ecosystem is OK by now (see https://www.arewewebyet.org/), but in my opinion, it is still no where near that of the other web languages. In other words, we are not willing to pay the price for playing this innovation card.
Haskell, as with Rust, I personally adore, but is simply too esoteric for us. There are problem domains where it shines, ours is not one of them.
Pros of Elixir
- Concurrency174
- Functional162
- Erlang vm133
- Great documentation113
- Great tooling105
- Immutable data structures87
- Open source81
- Pattern-matching77
- Easy to get started62
- Actor library59
- Functional with a neat syntax32
- Ruby inspired29
- Erlang evolved25
- Homoiconic24
- Beauty of Ruby, Speed of Erlang/C22
- Fault Tolerant17
- Simple14
- High Performance13
- Doc as first class citizen11
- Good lang11
- Pipe Operator11
- Stinkin' fast, no memory leaks, easy on the eyes9
- Fun to write9
- OTP8
- Resilient to failure8
- GenServer takes the guesswork out of background work6
- Pattern matching4
- Not Swift4
- Idempotence4
- Fast, Concurrent with clean error messages4
- Easy to use3
- Dynamic Typing2
- Error isolation2
Pros of Perl
- Lots of libraries72
- Open source66
- Text processing61
- Powerful54
- Unix-style49
- Regex47
- Stable37
- Concise syntax32
- Hackerish29
- Easy to use22
- Swiss army chainsaw16
- Code Less Do More13
- CPAN12
- Freedom9
- All purpose8
- Readability5
- Familiar5
- Many ways to do it5
- Community5
- Object-Oriented4
- Modular4
- Smart (does alot for you)4
- Postmodern3
- It's the best one-off task language3
- For a man2
- Good man pages2
- Auto case variables1
- Single Source Library (CPAN)1
- Multi-threaded support1
- Multiparadigm1
- C-style1
- Hashes1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elixir
- Fewer jobs for Elixir experts11
- Smaller userbase than other mainstream languages7
- Elixir's dot notation less readable ("object": 1st arg)5
- Dynamic typing4
- Difficult to understand2
- Not a lot of learning books available1
Cons of Perl
- Messy $/@/% syntax4
- No exception handling3
- Bad OO support2
- "1;"2
- No OS threads2
- Variables are global by default1
- Copy-on-create for interpreter-based threads1
- Barewords1
- Errors/warnings are ignored by default1