Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Elixir

3.4K
3.3K
+ 1
1.3K
Perl

3.5K
933
+ 1
575
Add tool

Elixir vs Perl: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Elixir and Perl

Elixir and Perl are both popular programming languages, but they have fundamental differences that set them apart. Here are the key differences between Elixir and Perl:

  1. Syntax: Elixir has a modern and clean syntax inspired by Ruby, while Perl uses a more complex and flexible syntax known for its "TIMTOWTDI" (There Is More Than One Way To Do It) approach. Elixir's syntax is easier to read and follow, making it more beginner-friendly and promoting maintainability.

  2. Concurrency and Parallelism: Elixir is built on the Erlang virtual machine, which is designed for concurrency and parallelism. It has built-in support for lightweight processes (called "actors") and a message-passing communication model, making it highly scalable and efficient in handling concurrent tasks. Perl, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for concurrency and parallelism, requiring additional modules or manual implementation.

  3. Functional Programming vs Scripting: Elixir is a functional programming language, meaning it emphasizes immutable data and pure functions, promoting modularity and predictable behavior. Perl, on the other hand, is primarily used as a scripting language, allowing quick and dirty solutions with its rich collection of built-in functions and regular expression support. Elixir's focus on functional programming makes it suitable for complex, reliable, and maintainable systems.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Perl has a long-standing and active community with a vast ecosystem of libraries and modules available on CPAN (Comprehensive Perl Archive Network). It has been around for decades and has a wealth of resources and solutions for various tasks. Although Elixir's community is relatively smaller, it is rapidly growing and has a passionate developer base. It also has its own package manager (Hex) and a growing ecosystem of libraries focused on scalability and fault tolerance.

  5. Type System: Elixir has a powerful and flexible type system, thanks to its underlying Erlang virtual machine, which supports dynamic typing and pattern matching. It allows for better code expressiveness and robustness, catching errors at compile-time or runtime. Perl, on the other hand, has a more permissive and flexible type system, often relying on implicit conversions and context-dependent behavior.

  6. Error Handling: Elixir promotes a philosophy of "let it crash" and has built-in mechanisms for handling errors, such as supervisors and fault tolerance. It encourages the idea of failing fast and recovering gracefully. Perl, on the other hand, has a more traditional error handling approach with explicit exception handling using try-catch blocks and error-checking functions.

In summary, Elixir and Perl differ in terms of syntax, concurrency/parallelism capabilities, programming paradigms, community/ecosystem, type systems, and error handling approaches. These differences impact their suitability for different types of projects and emphasize their unique strengths.

Decisions about Elixir and Perl

#rust #elixir So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me

See more
Timm Stelzer
VP Of Engineering at Flexperto GmbH · | 18 upvotes · 651.5K views

We have a lot of experience in JavaScript, writing our services in NodeJS allows developers to transition to the back end without any friction, without having to learn a new language. There is also the option to write services in TypeScript, which adds an expressive type layer. The semi-shared ecosystem between front and back end is nice as well, though specifically NodeJS libraries sometimes suffer in quality, compared to other major languages.

As for why we didn't pick the other languages, most of it comes down to "personal preference" and historically grown code bases, but let's do some post-hoc deduction:

Go is a practical choice, reasonably easy to learn, but until we find performance issues with our NodeJS stack, there is simply no reason to switch. The benefits of using NodeJS so far outweigh those of picking Go. This might change in the future.

PHP is a language we're still using in big parts of our system, and are still sometimes writing new code in. Modern PHP has fixed some of its issues, and probably has the fastest development cycle time, but it suffers around modelling complex asynchronous tasks, and (on a personal note) lack of support for writing in a functional style.

We don't use Python, Elixir or Ruby, mostly because of personal preference and for historic reasons.

Rust, though I personally love and use it in my projects, would require us to specifically hire for that, as the learning curve is quite steep. Its web ecosystem is OK by now (see https://www.arewewebyet.org/), but in my opinion, it is still no where near that of the other web languages. In other words, we are not willing to pay the price for playing this innovation card.

Haskell, as with Rust, I personally adore, but is simply too esoteric for us. There are problem domains where it shines, ours is not one of them.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Elixir
Pros of Perl
  • 174
    Concurrency
  • 162
    Functional
  • 133
    Erlang vm
  • 113
    Great documentation
  • 105
    Great tooling
  • 87
    Immutable data structures
  • 81
    Open source
  • 77
    Pattern-matching
  • 62
    Easy to get started
  • 59
    Actor library
  • 32
    Functional with a neat syntax
  • 29
    Ruby inspired
  • 25
    Erlang evolved
  • 24
    Homoiconic
  • 22
    Beauty of Ruby, Speed of Erlang/C
  • 17
    Fault Tolerant
  • 14
    Simple
  • 13
    High Performance
  • 11
    Doc as first class citizen
  • 11
    Good lang
  • 11
    Pipe Operator
  • 9
    Stinkin' fast, no memory leaks, easy on the eyes
  • 9
    Fun to write
  • 8
    OTP
  • 8
    Resilient to failure
  • 6
    GenServer takes the guesswork out of background work
  • 4
    Pattern matching
  • 4
    Not Swift
  • 4
    Idempotence
  • 4
    Fast, Concurrent with clean error messages
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Dynamic Typing
  • 2
    Error isolation
  • 72
    Lots of libraries
  • 66
    Open source
  • 61
    Text processing
  • 54
    Powerful
  • 49
    Unix-style
  • 47
    Regex
  • 37
    Stable
  • 32
    Concise syntax
  • 29
    Hackerish
  • 22
    Easy to use
  • 16
    Swiss army chainsaw
  • 13
    Code Less Do More
  • 12
    CPAN
  • 9
    Freedom
  • 8
    All purpose
  • 5
    Readability
  • 5
    Familiar
  • 5
    Many ways to do it
  • 5
    Community
  • 4
    Object-Oriented
  • 4
    Modular
  • 4
    Smart (does alot for you)
  • 3
    Postmodern
  • 3
    It's the best one-off task language
  • 2
    For a man
  • 2
    Good man pages
  • 1
    Auto case variables
  • 1
    Single Source Library (CPAN)
  • 1
    Multi-threaded support
  • 1
    Multiparadigm
  • 1
    C-style
  • 1
    Hashes

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Elixir
Cons of Perl
  • 11
    Fewer jobs for Elixir experts
  • 7
    Smaller userbase than other mainstream languages
  • 5
    Elixir's dot notation less readable ("object": 1st arg)
  • 4
    Dynamic typing
  • 2
    Difficult to understand
  • 1
    Not a lot of learning books available
  • 4
    Messy $/@/% syntax
  • 3
    No exception handling
  • 2
    Bad OO support
  • 2
    "1;"
  • 2
    No OS threads
  • 1
    Variables are global by default
  • 1
    Copy-on-create for interpreter-based threads
  • 1
    Barewords
  • 1
    Errors/warnings are ignored by default

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Elixir?

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

What is Perl?

Perl is a general-purpose programming language originally developed for text manipulation and now used for a wide range of tasks including system administration, web development, network programming, GUI development, and more.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Elixir?
What companies use Perl?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Elixir?
What tools integrate with Perl?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Oct 24 2019 at 7:43PM

AppSignal

JavaScriptNode.jsJava+8
5
1001
What are some alternatives to Elixir and Perl?
Golang
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
Erlang
Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.
Clojure
Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.
Ruby
Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.
Rust
Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.
See all alternatives