StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Elm vs NativeScript

Elm vs NativeScript

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NativeScript
NativeScript
Stacks533
Followers1.1K
Votes516
GitHub Stars25.3K
Forks1.7K
Elm
Elm
Stacks758
Followers744
Votes319

Elm vs NativeScript: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code outlines the key differences between Elm and NativeScript for website developers.

1. **Language Type**: Elm is a functional programming language that compiles to JavaScript, focusing on strong type inference to help prevent runtime errors. On the other hand, NativeScript is not a language but rather a platform that allows developers to build native mobile applications using JavaScript or TypeScript.
   
2. **Platform**: Elm is primarily geared towards web development, providing tools for creating web applications with a focus on user interface design and performance. NativeScript, on the other hand, is specifically designed for building native mobile applications that can target both iOS and Android platforms.

3. **User Interface**: When it comes to user interface design, Elm uses its own unique virtual DOM implementation for rendering UI components efficiently. NativeScript, on the other hand, uses a direct access model to interact with native APIs and UI components from JavaScript, providing a high degree of control over the native UI elements.

4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Elm has a smaller yet vibrant community focused on functional programming principles and best practices. NativeScript has a larger community due to its broader appeal for mobile app development, offering a wide range of plugins and libraries to extend the platform's capabilities.

5. **Performance**: Elm emphasizes performance in its design, utilizing immutable data structures and memoization techniques to optimize runtime behavior. NativeScript leverages native platform APIs and UI components to provide high-performance interactions and animations on mobile devices.

6. **Learning Curve**: Elm's functional programming paradigm may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with the concepts of immutability and pure functions. In contrast, NativeScript's use of JavaScript or TypeScript makes it more accessible to a broader range of web developers looking to transition into mobile app development.

In Summary, the key differences between Elm and NativeScript lie in their language type, platform focus, user interface approaches, community support, performance optimizations, and learning curves for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NativeScript
NativeScript
Elm
Elm

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

100% Access to Native Platform API;NativeScript is free of charge as an open source project;Code with JavaScript. Style with CSS;Cross-platform UI abstractions;Shared business logic and data models
No Runtime Exceptions; Fearless refactoring; Understand anyone's code; Fast and friendly feedback; Enforced Semantic Versioning; Small Assets
Statistics
GitHub Stars
25.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
533
Stacks
758
Followers
1.1K
Followers
744
Votes
516
Votes
319
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Access to the entire native api
  • 47
    Support for native ios and android libraries
  • 46
    Support for javascript libraries
  • 46
    Angular 2.0 support
  • 44
    Native ux and performance
Cons
  • 5
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Slower Performance compared to competitors
Pros
  • 45
    Code stays clean
  • 44
    Great type system
  • 40
    No Runtime Exceptions
  • 33
    Fun
  • 28
    Easy to understand
Cons
  • 3
    No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions)
  • 2
    JS interoperability a bit more involved
  • 2
    JS interop can not be async
  • 1
    No JSX/Template
  • 1
    Backwards compability breaks between releases

What are some alternatives to NativeScript, Elm?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot