StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Elm vs Vue.js

Elm vs Vue.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K
Elm
Elm
Stacks758
Followers744
Votes319

Elm vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This Markdown code will provide key differences between Elm and Vue.js in a concise manner.

1. **Language Type**: Elm is a functional programming language, while Vue.js is a JavaScript framework that allows both functional and imperative programming styles. Elm enforces a pure functional approach with immutable data structures and no side effects, promoting a robust and reliable codebase. On the other hand, Vue.js provides flexibility for developers to choose the programming paradigm that suits their project requirements.

2. **State Management**: In Elm, managing state is done through the use of model-view-update (MVU) architecture, where changes to the state are handled by updating the model and then re-rendering the view accordingly. Vue.js, however, offers various options for state management, including Vuex for larger applications that need centralized state management and reactive updates throughout the application.

3. **Type Safety**: Elm is statically typed, which means that all expressions have a type known at compile time, avoiding runtime type errors. Vue.js, being based on JavaScript, is not statically typed, allowing for more flexibility but potentially leading to type-related bugs during runtime if not handled properly.

4. **Learning Curve**: Elm has a steep learning curve for developers who are new to functional programming due to its stringent rules and paradigms. In contrast, Vue.js is more user-friendly for developers familiar with JavaScript, as it allows for a mix of imperative and reactive programming styles, making it easier to adapt to.

5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Vue.js has a larger and more versatile community with a wide range of plugins, components, and tools readily available for developers to use and contribute to. Elm, although growing steadily, has a smaller community and ecosystem, which could limit the resources and support available for developers working with the language.

6. **Performance**: Elm, with its functional nature and immutable data structures, tends to offer better performance in terms of handling complex computations and rendering updates efficiently. Vue.js, while also performant, may require additional optimizations in larger applications to maintain smooth performance due to its more flexible nature.

In Summary, the key differences between Elm and Vue.js lie in their programming paradigms, state management approaches, type safety, learning curves, community support, and performance optimizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vue.js
Vue.js
Elm
Elm

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
No Runtime Exceptions; Fearless refactoring; Understand anyone's code; Fast and friendly feedback; Enforced Semantic Versioning; Small Assets
Statistics
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
55.5K
Stacks
758
Followers
44.7K
Followers
744
Votes
1.6K
Votes
319
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
Pros
  • 45
    Code stays clean
  • 44
    Great type system
  • 40
    No Runtime Exceptions
  • 33
    Fun
  • 28
    Easy to understand
Cons
  • 3
    No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions)
  • 2
    JS interop can not be async
  • 2
    JS interoperability a bit more involved
  • 1
    Backwards compability breaks between releases
  • 1
    No communication with users

What are some alternatives to Vue.js, Elm?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot