Elm vs Yesod

Overview

Yesod

Stacks37

Followers41

Votes15

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks376

Elm

Stacks758

Followers744

Votes319

Elm vs Yesod: What are the differences?

Syntax and Language: Elm is a functional programming language that compiles to JavaScript and has a strong emphasis on simplicity and ease of use. Yesod, on the other hand, is a Haskell web framework that allows developers to build highly scalable web applications with a focus on type safety and correctness.
Architecture and Use Cases: Elm is primarily used for front-end development, providing a reliable way to build user interfaces with its virtual DOM implementation. Yesod, on the other hand, is more suited for back-end development, offering a robust framework for building web applications and APIs.
Community and Ecosystem: Elm has a smaller community compared to Yesod, but it has a strong focus on documentation and beginner-friendly resources. Yesod, being a Haskell framework, has a larger community of experienced developers and a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools.
Tooling and Development Experience: Elm comes with its own set of tools like Elm Reactor for live code editing and Elm Package for managing dependencies. Yesod leverages the Haskell ecosystem and tools like GHC compiler for optimized code generation and cabal for package management.
Performance and Scalability: Elm's virtual DOM and pure functional nature contribute to its high performance and low memory usage, making it suitable for building highly interactive applications. Yesod, being built on Haskell, offers strong type safety and optimizations for scalability, making it a robust choice for complex web applications.
Learning Curve and Adoption: Elm's simpler syntax and focus on declarative programming make it easier for beginners to grasp functional concepts, while Yesod's strong typing system and Haskell's advanced features may have a steeper learning curve but offer powerful abstractions for experienced developers to work with.

In Summary, Elm and Yesod differ in syntax, architecture, community, tooling, performance, and learning curve, catering to different use cases and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Yesod	Elm
Yesod believes in the philosophy of making the compiler your ally, not your enemy. We use the type system to enforce as much as possible, from generating proper links, to avoiding XSS attacks, to dealing with character encoding issues. In general, if your code compiles, it works. And instead of declaring types everywhere you let the compiler figure them out for you with type inference.	Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.
Safety & security guaranteed at compile time; Developer productivity; Raw performance; Fast, compiled code; Techniques for constant-space memory consumption; Asynchronous IO	No Runtime Exceptions; Fearless refactoring; Understand anyone's code; Fast and friendly feedback; Enforced Semantic Versioning; Small Assets
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 376	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 37	Stacks 758
Followers 41	Followers 744
Votes 15	Votes 319
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Haskell 4 Super High Performance 3 Open source 2 Type safe URLs	Pros 45 Code stays clean 44 Great type system 40 No Runtime Exceptions 33 Fun 28 Easy to understand Cons 3 No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions) 2 JS interop can not be async 2 JS interoperability a bit more involved 1 More code is required 1 Backwards compability breaks between releases
Integrations
Haskell	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Yesod, Elm?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Elm vs Yesod: What are the differences?

Syntax and Language: Elm is a functional programming language that compiles to JavaScript and has a strong emphasis on simplicity and ease of use. Yesod, on the other hand, is a Haskell web framework that allows developers to build highly scalable web applications with a focus on type safety and correctness.
Architecture and Use Cases: Elm is primarily used for front-end development, providing a reliable way to build user interfaces with its virtual DOM implementation. Yesod, on the other hand, is more suited for back-end development, offering a robust framework for building web applications and APIs.
Community and Ecosystem: Elm has a smaller community compared to Yesod, but it has a strong focus on documentation and beginner-friendly resources. Yesod, being a Haskell framework, has a larger community of experienced developers and a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools.
Tooling and Development Experience: Elm comes with its own set of tools like Elm Reactor for live code editing and Elm Package for managing dependencies. Yesod leverages the Haskell ecosystem and tools like GHC compiler for optimized code generation and cabal for package management.
Performance and Scalability: Elm's virtual DOM and pure functional nature contribute to its high performance and low memory usage, making it suitable for building highly interactive applications. Yesod, being built on Haskell, offers strong type safety and optimizations for scalability, making it a robust choice for complex web applications.
Learning Curve and Adoption: Elm's simpler syntax and focus on declarative programming make it easier for beginners to grasp functional concepts, while Yesod's strong typing system and Haskell's advanced features may have a steeper learning curve but offer powerful abstractions for experienced developers to work with.

In Summary, Elm and Yesod differ in syntax, architecture, community, tooling, performance, and learning curve, catering to different use cases and development preferences.

Elm vs Yesod

Overview