StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Text & Language Models
  4. Embedding As A Service
  5. Embedly vs Jekyll

Embedly vs Jekyll

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Embedly
Embedly
Stacks72
Followers72
Votes0
Jekyll
Jekyll
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.4K
Votes230
GitHub Stars51.0K
Forks10.2K

Embedly vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Developers describe Embedly as "Build Richer Content Into Your Websites And Apps". Embed- Get the world’s most powerful tool for embedding videos, photos, and rich media into websites. Extract- Use the elements—colors, text, keywords, and entities—that you want from articles. Discard the rest automatically. Display- Use the elements—colors, text, keywords, and entities—that you want from articles. Discard the rest automatically.Make the images you use look great—and display quickly—on any screen, every time. On the other hand, Jekyll is detailed as "Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby". Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Embedly can be classified as a tool in the "Embedding as a Service" category, while Jekyll is grouped under "Static Site Generators".

Some of the features offered by Embedly are:

  • Add embeddable media and more to your site- Make your website more engaging with video, images, audio, and more. Embed turns any URL into embeddable content.
  • Get more value from articles- Extract allows you to harvest important features from articles—so you can use written content how you want to. Control colors, text, keywords, and entities in any article on your site. Remove extraneous information
  • Picture perfect—every time- Display adjusts images to display correctly on your site. It saves you the hassle of resizing every image, and saves your users—even those on mobile devices—the pain of waiting for incorrectly optimized images to load.

On the other hand, Jekyll provides the following key features:

  • Simple - No more databases, comment moderation, or pesky updates to install—just your content.
  • Static - Markdown (or Textile), Liquid, HTML & CSS go in. Static sites come out ready for deployment.
  • Blog-aware - Permalinks, categories, pages, posts, and custom layouts are all first-class citizens here.

Jekyll is an open source tool with 38.1K GitHub stars and 8.31K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Jekyll's open source repository on GitHub.

Sentry, New Relic, and Tilt are some of the popular companies that use Jekyll, whereas Embedly is used by reddit, Soundcloud, and Kickstarter. Jekyll has a broader approval, being mentioned in 111 company stacks & 125 developers stacks; compared to Embedly, which is listed in 25 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Embedly, Jekyll

Manuel
Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k
Comments
Kazim
Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.6k views53.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Embedly
Embedly
Jekyll
Jekyll

Embed- Get the world’s most powerful tool for embedding videos, photos, and rich media into websites. Extract- Use the elements—colors, text, keywords, and entities—that you want from articles. Discard the rest automatically. Display- Use the elements—colors, text, keywords, and entities—that you want from articles. Discard the rest automatically.Make the images you use look great—and display quickly—on any screen, every time.

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Add embeddable media and more to your site- Make your website more engaging with video, images, audio, and more. Embed turns any URL into embeddable content.;Get more value from articles- Extract allows you to harvest important features from articles—so you can use written content how you want to. Control colors, text, keywords, and entities in any article on your site. Remove extraneous information;Picture perfect—every time- Display adjusts images to display correctly on your site. It saves you the hassle of resizing every image, and saves your users—even those on mobile devices—the pain of waiting for incorrectly optimized images to load.
Simple - No more databases, comment moderation, or pesky updates to install—just your content.;Static - Markdown (or Textile), Liquid, HTML & CSS go in. Static sites come out ready for deployment.;Blog-aware - Permalinks, categories, pages, posts, and custom layouts are all first-class citizens here.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10.2K
Stacks
72
Stacks
2.0K
Followers
72
Followers
1.4K
Votes
0
Votes
230
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 74
    Github pages integration
  • 54
    Open source
  • 37
    It's slick, customisable and hackerish
  • 24
    Easy to deploy
  • 23
    Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
Cons
  • 4
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
  • 2
    Lack of developments lately
  • 1
    Og doesn't work with postings dynamically

What are some alternatives to Embedly, Jekyll?

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope