StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Ember.js vs React Monocle

Ember.js vs React Monocle

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ember.js
Ember.js
Stacks1.6K
Followers865
Votes775
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks4.2K
React Monocle
React Monocle
Stacks5
Followers34
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.4K
Forks76

Ember.js vs React Monocle: What are the differences?

<Ember.js and React Monocle are two popular JavaScript frameworks used for building web applications. Ember.js is a comprehensive framework that provides a strong structure for developing ambitious web applications, while React Monocle is a lightweight library focused on building user interfaces. Below are the key differences between Ember.js and React Monocle.>

  1. Architecture: Ember.js follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, while React Monocle uses a unidirectional data flow architecture. This means that Ember.js provides a more structured approach to organizing code and separating concerns, while React Monocle simplifies the data flow by having a single source of truth.

  2. Learning Curve: Ember.js has a steeper learning curve due to its convention over configuration approach and a larger set of built-in features, while React Monocle is easier to grasp for beginners and developers looking for a more flexible and minimalistic solution. This makes Ember.js more suitable for complex applications that require standardized patterns and best practices, while React Monocle is preferred for smaller projects or when customization is a priority.

  3. Componentization: React Monocle is highly focused on component-based architecture, where everything is a component, making it easier to reuse and compose UI elements. In contrast, while Ember.js also supports components, it places more emphasis on controllers and routes to manage application logic, which can make it slightly less intuitive for those familiar with React Monocle's component-centric approach.

  4. State Management: React Monocle relies on libraries such as Redux or MobX for managing application state, offering more flexibility and scalability in state management compared to Ember.js, which has its own Ember Data library but may require additional tools for state management in complex applications.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Ember.js has a strong and dedicated community with a rich ecosystem of plugins, addons, and resources, making it well-suited for long-term projects with ongoing support and updates. React Monocle, being less opinionated, benefits from the broader React ecosystem and the popularity of React, which can provide more opportunities for finding solutions and resources across different projects and frameworks.

In Summary, Ember.js and React Monocle differ in their architecture, learning curve, componentization, state management, and community support, making them suitable for different types of projects and preferences in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ember.js, React Monocle

neha
neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js
Ember.js
React Monocle
React Monocle

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

React Monocle parses through your React source files to generate a visual tree graph representing your React component hierarchy. The tree is then displayed along with a live copy of your application. This is done by using your un-minified bundle file to inject wrapper functions around setState calls in order to have our tree display real-time feedback.

Creating web apps;Building UI
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Stars
2.4K
GitHub Forks
4.2K
GitHub Forks
76
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
5
Followers
865
Followers
34
Votes
775
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    Elegant
  • 97
    Quick to develop
  • 83
    Great mvc
  • 82
    Great community
  • 73
    Great router
Cons
  • 2
    Very little flexibility
  • 2
    Too much convention, too little configuration
  • 1
    Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful
  • 1
    Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
React
React

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, React Monocle?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Durandal

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

PrimeNg

PrimeNg

It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase