Entity Framework Core vs Sugar ORM

Overview

Sugar ORM

Stacks3

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.6K

Forks577

Entity Framework Core

Stacks1.1K

Followers225

Votes16

GitHub Stars9.0K

Forks2.3K

Entity Framework Core vs Sugar ORM: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between Entity Framework Core and Sugar ORM. Entity Framework Core is a popular object-relational mapping (ORM) framework for .NET, while Sugar ORM is an ORM framework for Android development.

Database Support: Entity Framework Core is designed to work with a variety of databases, including Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite, among others. On the other hand, Sugar ORM is specifically built for Android development and supports SQLite as the underlying database.
Platform Compatibility: Entity Framework Core is a cross-platform ORM framework, which means it can be used on multiple platforms like Windows, macOS, and Linux. Sugar ORM, on the other hand, is specifically built for Android and does not have native support for other platforms.
Performance: Entity Framework Core is known for its performance optimizations and can efficiently generate database queries. It also provides features like query caching and parallel execution for improved performance. Sugar ORM, while efficient for smaller applications, may not perform as well as Entity Framework Core when dealing with large-scale databases or complex queries.
LINQ Support: Entity Framework Core provides native support for LINQ (Language Integrated Query), which allows developers to write queries using a strongly-typed programming language like C#. This makes it easier to write and maintain complex querying logic. Sugar ORM, on the other hand, does not have native LINQ support and relies on traditional SQL queries.
Migration and Schema Evolution: Entity Framework Core provides a rich set of tools and features for managing database schema changes and migrations. It can automatically generate and apply migrations, making it easier to evolve the database schema over time. Sugar ORM, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for database migrations and schema evolution, which can make it more challenging to manage changes to the database structure.
Community and Ecosystem: Entity Framework Core has a large and active community of developers, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support available. It also has a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries and extensions. Sugar ORM, while popular among Android developers, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.

In summary, Entity Framework Core is a cross-platform ORM framework with support for multiple databases, providing rich features for performance optimization, LINQ support, migration management, and benefiting from a large community and ecosystem. Sugar ORM, on the other hand, is specifically built for Android development, supporting SQLite as the underlying database, but may lack some of the advanced features and broader platform compatibility of Entity Framework Core.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sugar ORM	Entity Framework Core
It is a database persistence library that provides a simple and concise way to integrate your application models into SQLite. It eliminates writing SQL queries to interact with SQLite db.	It is a lightweight, extensible, open source and cross-platform version of the popular Entity Framework data access technology. It can serve as an object-relational mapper (O/RM), enabling .NET developers to work with a database using .NET objects, and eliminating the need for most of the data-access code they usually need to write.
A simple, concise, and clean integration process with minimal configuration; Automatic table and column naming through reflection; Support for migrations between different schema versions	Lightweight ;Extensible , Cross Platform; ORM; .NET Core; .NET Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.6K	GitHub Stars 9.0K
GitHub Forks 577	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 3	Stacks 1.1K
Followers 11	Followers 225
Votes 0	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 7 Fits very well with Microsoft technologies 4 Fast 2 Linq 1 OpenSource 1 Easy to use Cons 1 Dbcontext
Integrations
SQLite Android OS	Firebird PostgreSQL Oracle Azure Cosmos DB MariaDB Microsoft Access SQLite MySQL .NET .NET Core

What are some alternatives to Sugar ORM, Entity Framework Core?

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

Hibernate

Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

MikroORM

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

Entity Framework

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

peewee

A small, expressive orm, written in python (2.6+, 3.2+), with built-in support for sqlite, mysql and postgresql and special extensions like hstore.

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

Dapper

It is an object-relational mapping product for the Microsoft.NET platform: it provides a framework for mapping an object-oriented domain model to a traditional relational database.

Related Comparisons

Entity Framework Core vs Sugar ORM: What are the differences?

Introduction

Database Support: Entity Framework Core is designed to work with a variety of databases, including Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite, among others. On the other hand, Sugar ORM is specifically built for Android development and supports SQLite as the underlying database.
Platform Compatibility: Entity Framework Core is a cross-platform ORM framework, which means it can be used on multiple platforms like Windows, macOS, and Linux. Sugar ORM, on the other hand, is specifically built for Android and does not have native support for other platforms.
Performance: Entity Framework Core is known for its performance optimizations and can efficiently generate database queries. It also provides features like query caching and parallel execution for improved performance. Sugar ORM, while efficient for smaller applications, may not perform as well as Entity Framework Core when dealing with large-scale databases or complex queries.
LINQ Support: Entity Framework Core provides native support for LINQ (Language Integrated Query), which allows developers to write queries using a strongly-typed programming language like C#. This makes it easier to write and maintain complex querying logic. Sugar ORM, on the other hand, does not have native LINQ support and relies on traditional SQL queries.
Migration and Schema Evolution: Entity Framework Core provides a rich set of tools and features for managing database schema changes and migrations. It can automatically generate and apply migrations, making it easier to evolve the database schema over time. Sugar ORM, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for database migrations and schema evolution, which can make it more challenging to manage changes to the database structure.
Community and Ecosystem: Entity Framework Core has a large and active community of developers, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support available. It also has a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries and extensions. Sugar ORM, while popular among Android developers, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.

Entity Framework Core vs Sugar ORM

Overview

Entity Framework Core vs Sugar ORM: What are the differences?