Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Erlang vs ReasonML: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
1. **Concurrency Model**: Erlang uses the actor model while ReasonML uses the React-based models. In Erlang, each "process" acts like a separate entity with its own memory, while in ReasonML, components in React manage their own state.
2. **Typing System**: Erlang is dynamically typed, meaning type checking is done at runtime, whereas ReasonML is statically typed with strong type inference, catching errors at compile time.
3. **Language Paradigm**: Erlang follows a functional programming paradigm, where functions are first-class citizens and immutable data structures are favored, while ReasonML combines functional and imperative programming with its syntax resembling OCaml.
4. **Tooling Support**: Erlang has its own OTP framework for building scalable and fault-tolerant systems, whereas ReasonML benefits from the vast tooling support of JavaScript ecosystem due to its compatibility with it.
5. **Compilation Targets**: Erlang code is compiled into bytecode that runs on the Erlang Virtual Machine (BEAM), whereas ReasonML code is compiled into JavaScript, enabling it to be used for front-end development.
6. **Community Support**: Erlang has a strong community focusing on telecom applications and distributed systems, while ReasonML community, being relatively newer, is more diverse with a focus on web development and tooling.
In Summary, Erlang and ReasonML differ in their concurrency model, typing system, language paradigm, tooling support, compilation targets, and community focus.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of Erlang
Pros of ReasonML
Pros of Erlang
- Real time, distributed applications62
- Concurrency Support62
- Fault tolerance58
- Soft real-time36
- Open source32
- Message passing22
- Functional programming22
- Immutable data16
- Works as expected14
- Facebook chat uses it at backend6
- Practical5
- Knowledgeable community5
- Bullets included4
- WhatsApp uses it at backend1
Pros of ReasonML
- Pattern Matching4
- Type System3
- React1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Erlang
Cons of ReasonML
Cons of Erlang
- Languange is not popular demand1
Cons of ReasonML
- Bindings1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
2K
2.8K
9.7K
780
6
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Erlang?
Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.
What is ReasonML?
It lets you write simple, fast and quality type safe code while leveraging both the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems.It is powerful, safe type inference means you rarely have to annotate types, but everything gets checked for you.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention Erlang and ReasonML as a desired skillset
What companies use Erlang?
What companies use ReasonML?
What companies use ReasonML?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Erlang?
What tools integrate with ReasonML?
What tools integrate with Erlang?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
What are some alternatives to Erlang and ReasonML?
Elixir
Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.
Haskell
It is a general purpose language that can be used in any domain and use case, it is ideally suited for proprietary business logic and data analysis, fast prototyping and enhancing existing software environments with correct code, performance and scalability.
Golang
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
Clojure
Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.
Akka
Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.