Escher vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
Escher: An Elm-like web framework for Julia. A web server for 2016. Escher's built-in web server allows you to create interactive UIs with very little code. It takes care of messaging between Julia and the browser under-the-hood. It can also hot-load code: you can see your UI evolve as you save your changes to it; Phalcon: Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP. Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
Escher and Phalcon can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Escher and Phalcon are both open source tools. Phalcon with 9.74K GitHub stars and 1.78K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Escher with 312 GitHub stars and 63 GitHub forks.
What is Escher?
What is Phalcon?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Escher?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Escher?
What companies use Escher?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
'm a professional web developer from Vietnam with B.S Physics and Engineering. I'm a Phalcon enthusiast as Opensource. In free time, I was support on forum Phalcon also my forum and contribution core Phalcon.
I think precompiled PHP is the way to go. It saves CPU cycles, RAM and overall I/O. It saves money too. Smaller requirements = smaller bills.
I've tried symfony and zend. Phalcon was easiest to use.